Bathing machine edit

Article is no longer a featured article.

No references or citations. Very little information; the "history" section seems especially inadequate. This article is a Brilliant Prose relic that never went through a FAC listing (or at least no record of one exists). A request for references on the talk page has gone unanswered for almost a year. Andrew Levine 07:58, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Remove. It's finally got one reference, but that's not enough. Would also like to see a little more detail on its workings in images and some more details on how they were perceived at the time. - Mgm|(talk) 12:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove. No longer among the best of Wikipedia, and doesn't meet much of the current criteria. - Taxman Talk 23:07, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove per above. According to WP:MOS, the sections should be simply named "Use" and "History". AndyZ 00:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove per nom. Mikker ... 03:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove for lack of refs or citation. Staxringold 13:56, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • remove per nom Zzzzz 14:33, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]