Proposed deletion of File:Tommyboy1334 on vacation.jpg edit

 

The file File:Tommyboy1334 on vacation.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Tommywiki.jpg edit

 

The file File:Tommywiki.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Tommyboy with new hat.jpg edit

 

The file File:Tommyboy with new hat.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Jon Kolbert: Oh no, not remnants of my Wiki past! Anything but that! >.< Thank you for deleting, they were uploaded at another time of life (i.e. naive high school child who didn't know the rules). I appreciate it. Cheers. -- Tomfoolery 20:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Tomfoolery: Haha, no problem. I'm just going through a few files and deleting ones that are unused and not otherwise useful to the project :P Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

MediaBanda moved to Draft:MediaBanda edit

Hi , Greetings. Pls note that your creation of MediaBanda has been moved to Draft:MediaBanda. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

  1. reliable source - see WP:RS (Note: Wikipedia can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR)
  2. primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
  3. verification - see WP:V
  4. notability - see WP:N
  5. citing source - see WP:Citing sources and WP:Tutorial/Citing sources
  6. citing from internet sourc - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations, kindly ping me at my talk page or at your talk page by typing {{ping|CASSIOPEIA}} (please remove "nowiki" upon replying) for me to review the page. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:59, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi tomfoolery, Thank you for adding the source into the page. However, you need to use Wikipedia citing method instead of copy and paste the URL into the body text. Please refer to point 4 &5 on my previous message to you.Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:47, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
@CASSIOPEIA: Hi, I'll be honest, I don't remember contributing to that page, nor creating it. I recovered this username from an administrator after being asked to change my original username. Was this in error? Either way, you responded to your own comment without me making any edits to the aforementioned page. I will admit I am a little confused. -- Tomfoolery 20:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi Tomfoolery, Greetings to you. I guess you figured out by now that your previous user name Tommy Boy was redirect to your current user name :) as you have removed it - see here [1]. For all the mixed up, that was the reason why my message was sent to you instead of the current Tommy Boy talk page. Guess all is sorted out. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 22:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply