User talk:JMF/Archives/2021/July
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Em Dash Unicode
I copied the sentence, with adjustments, from the typology section (encoding and substitution) on the en dash. I read the em dash section, and not finding the unicode, wasted some time searching it out externally. It would have been helpful if it had been highlighted in the text, as it is with the en dash. Having to dig it out of a large reference table in another section makes it unnecessarily hard to find. In this case, convenience and ease of access outweighs the undesirability of redundancy, it seems to me. Peaceandlonglife (talk) 14:11, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Peaceandlonglife: To be fair, the article is inconsistent in when and where the Unicode code-point is given – or arguably is consistent in giving it for every type of dash except n-dash and m-dash but not in a consistent way. If you want to update the m-dash (and n-dash) sections to match, I wouldn't object provided that the addition is inline as it is with the other kinds of dash: I thought that to give it a single-sentence paragraph was undue. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:43, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
sfn and harv errors
I have the javascript installed that allows me to see an error message when the links don't work. Apparently there are too many false positives to have this as a default, but I find it useful. Not matching the date or authorship is common.
--WriterArtistDC (talk) 20:11, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @WriterArtistDC:, I will certainly install one of those widgets tomorrow. The case you found on my user page dates from when I was figuring out how to use Harv templates, so maybe not surprising it had an error. (I like to log these difficult or unusual techniques as I find them so that I don't have to start from first principles on the rate occasion that I will need them again.). Hopefully I didn't propagate the error into the article itself but I should check as it is a GA. Plus advise. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)