Danels97

Moving pages

The article is about Palestinian political violence undertaken to further political objectives such as self-determination in and sovereignty over Palestine, the liberation of Palestine and establishment of a Palestinian state, either in place of both Israel and the Palestinian territories or solely in the Palestinian territories as the article itself makes clear. Your move was reverted. That means you must go to the talk page of the article to get consensus for your proposed move. You should self-revert your move and open a discussion on the talk page. The article is covered by WP:1RR and discretionary sanctions. Regarding your edit summary "it isnt political at all. i made many studies about it and it isn't political violence type", you are not what Wikipedia regards as a reliable source, so please don't make any edits based on personal opinions. Are you going to move the page back and open a discussion on the article's talk page ? Sean.hoyland - talk 05:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

As you can see here, your move has been reverted by an administrator and the page has been move protected. If you think the page should be renamed, please start a discussion on the article's talk page citing policy based reasons for the move. Sean.hoyland - talk 11:29, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 08:38, 26 November 2023 (UTC)