Your recent reversion of Rafael Correa

edit

When you reverted this page, you only went back one edit, despite the fact that the vandal had made three vandalizing edits. As I had reverted all three before you got to the page, you restored some of the vandalism. Vandals very often make multiple vandalizing edits, and it is typically appropriate to revert all the edits a vandal has made to a page to make sure you catch everything. Usually if one edit is vandalism they all are. At the very least you should check the other edits.--Dycedarg ж 02:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that! Nfwu 02:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Happy to help! If you have questions about anything else vandalism related feel free to ask them on my talk page.--Dycedarg ж 02:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kumikyoku Nico Nico Douga

edit
 

The article Kumikyoku Nico Nico Douga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find significant coverage in English or Japanese

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Goszei (talk) 09:00, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply