I have changed my username from "Tots & little ones matter!" to "MamaLioness" "Maternalistic Lioness".

I write articles about the sexual abuse of children in the United Kingdom.

When I began, although Wikipedia's UK coverage of the abuse of teenage girls in particular seemed extensive, some other widely-reported cases involving far younger victims were strangely forgotten. More inclusive coverage of these awful crimes that remembers the experiences of younger victims and male victims, which are already widely reported in reliable sources, is perfectly compatible with building an encyclopedia.

In some of my articles, I briefly mentioned that one or more of the accused persons in a criminal trial was cleared of all charges. I have always deliberately omitted the names of these acquitted defendants. They are entitled to the presumption of innocence and I consistently had no interest whatsoever in writing about any of them.

Whenever I face false unsubstantiated allegations of publishing unspecified descriptions on Wikipedia of crimes that allegedly had no reliable sources, (a.k.a. "righting great wrongs"), no matter how many such allegations, so am I.