The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:19, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Bontadino de Bontadini, Wignacourt Aqueduct edit

The Wignacourt Aqueduct
The Wignacourt Aqueduct

Created by Xwejnusgozo (talk). Self-nominated at 16:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC).

  • Xwejnusgozo Since there are two article hooks you will have to provide two QPQ reviews, so you are one short. But I will review the two articles to see if there are other issues.
Wignacourt Aqueduct
  • Has the length and qualifies by being a GA. Is generally well sourced and well written as you would expect from a GA article. Hook is mentioned and cited, AGF on the source being in a foreign language. No copyright issues - it's detecting the inscription which would fall in the same category as a quote so that's okay with me.
Bontadino de Bontadini
  • Is long enough (only just) and is sourced. Both hooks are cited here and covers the statements. No copyright violations or source issues. Again I think this qualifies.
  • Over-all conclusion - if you do another QPQ and it can be passed if we use the main hook, Alt1 is not in Aquaduct article so that could not be used for this article.  MPJ-DK  23:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)