Talk:Wilderness Territory

(Redirected from Talk:Wilderness Territory (Wisconsin Dells))
Latest comment: 8 months ago by 173.23.42.9 in topic One single self-source!?!

https://www.wildernessresort.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Developers-History.pdf

Added this information.

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 03:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wilderness Territory (Wisconsin Dells)Wilderness Territory — Keeping it with the (Wisconsin Dells) portion of the name does not represent the whole article. Wilderness Territory now owns resorts outside of the Dells area, in Tennessee, and one planned for Missouri. — WisconsinCheeze (talk) 16:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Survey edit

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion edit

Any additional comments:
  • Oppose. There are many areas that could be called "wilderness territories". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:46, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
    • Really? Where? There aren't any notable enough to have an article at Wikipedia or even warrant a hatnote. — AjaxSmack 13:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Keeping it with the (Wisconsin Dells) portion of the name does not represent the whole article. Wilderness Territory now owns resorts outside of the Dells area, in Tennessee, and one planned for Missouri. This is the only Wilderness Territory for resort companies. WisconsinCheeze (talk) 16:32, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Nomination is straighforward and no contra arguments have been presented. — AjaxSmack 02:38, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hoo boy, this article... edit

This article's formatting is...questionable to say the least. It's very sporadic, and not very easy to follow. A lot of it also reads like an advertisement. I'm sure this article would have to be pretty much completely rewritten to better match Wikipedia's quality standards. HyperStormH (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

One single self-source!?! edit

This entire article is promotional original resource advertising featuring a single source--their own! 173.23.42.9 (talk) 17:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply