Talk:Quickplay Media
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedy deleted because... --Vrao63 (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Several pages already link to it, re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dece
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedy deleted because...it's a major player in the same space as mobiTV, which has a Wikipedia page. Here's an article in Broadcast Engineering which mentions all the efforts around powering coverage of the Super Bowl this year, including QuickPlay's service for Bell TV: http://broadcastengineering.com/news/super-bowl-xlv-coverage-features-traditional-new-media-technology/index.html--Vrao63 (talk) 16:31, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedy deleted because... --Redjoy2011 (talk) 18:22, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
While I agree the article could be enhanced, I don't think it should be deleted because the company has a noteworthy presence in the mobile video space (see independent analyst reports, subscription needed) and has been mentioned in multiple news stories (see Google news archive) (Redjoy2011 (talk))
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedy deleted because... it is mentioned as a competitor and linked on mobiTV's Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobitv--Vrao63 (talk) 20:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editI have removed the speedy deletion tag simply on procedural grounds. Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Speedy_deletion states that an article should not be speedied repeatedly, and that appears to have been the case here, more than once. Enough is enough. Please take to WP:AFD, if desired. (since a WP:PROD would likely be contested as well, or so I suspect). --Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:12, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- The only removals were drive-by utaggings by the same IP, most likely the creator. Replacing the tag doesn't strike me as being "speedied repeatedly". Hairhorn (talk) 15:46, 12 May 2011 (UTC)