Talk:Northgate Transit Center/GA1

Active discussions

GA ReviewEdit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Shearonink (talk · contribs) 08:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)


I will be giving this article a Review for possible WP:GA status. Shearonink (talk) 08:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:  
    A-OK. Shearonink (talk) 21:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:  
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:  
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:  
    Such a pleasure to Review an article and find no referencing problems. Shearonink (talk) 16:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
    C. It contains no original research:  
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:  
    Ran the copyvio tool, no problems found. Shearonink (talk) 21:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:  
    Straightforward article/ Shearonink (talk) 21:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:  
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:  
    Very stable. Shearonink (talk) 21:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    Thank goodness for Sounder Bruce! HIs photos are a real help. Shearonink (talk) 21:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    I am going to do a couple more deep proofreading/readthroughs to see if there's any issues I might have missed. Pending the finding of any problems, I'll probably be able to finish up this Review within the next few days. Shearonink (talk) 16:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
    This article fulfills all the GA criteria. Going forward the only improvements I could suggest would be to flesh out the notability claims in the lead and to see if there are any sources that refer to the community reaction - good/bad - to the Transit Center & its construction. Shearonink (talk) 16:40, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Return to "Northgate Transit Center/GA1" page.