Talk:Route 179 (Pennsylvania–New Jersey)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

I would suggest a copy-edit to get a better grip on the prose. The content is good and concise. There are prose problems though and I'm not too sure about the source mentioned below. We had discussions with WP:RS/N on it and it seems ok, but just to be sure...

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): - Updated:  — master son^{T - C} 17:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC) b (MoS): - Updated:  — master son^{T - C} 17:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

   • Several places require conversions to metric in the Route description. (Mileposts not included in this critique)
   • It heads east through Lambertville on Bridge Street through the downtown area of Lambertville. Can this be reworded to avoid the double mention of Lambertville.
   • How do we know NJ-165 is unsigned?

   Follow-up: Rechecked and looks good.  — master son^{T - C} 17:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): - Updated:  — master son^{T - C} 17:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC) c (OR):

   Can you find some additional sources to back up the Alps' Roads source, such as maps or historical almanacs from NJDOT? He sources the NJ State Statutes, Perhaps you could verify the content and source them as well.

   Follow-up: Rechecked and looks good.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Perhaps a few additional items about attractions on the road?

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On Hold

I have gone back and made changes to the article Dough4872 (talk) 23:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)