Talk:Königsberg-class cruiser (1905)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 02:01, 21 December 2012 (UTC) I'll review this one. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 02:01, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	it would benefit from making clear in the infobox that the general characteristics varied across the class, perhaps by noting that these are the general characteristics of Königsberg? Not a war stopper, just for clarity
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	I made a few minor grammatical and formatting changes, so feel free to revert if they are die in a ditch stuff. Well done on another great ship article! A pleasure to review it. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 02:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, Peacemaker - I added a note explaining that the infobox statistics are those for the lead ship. Parsecboy (talk) 10:57, 21 December 2012 (UTC)