Talk:Juliana Force/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aussie Article Writer (talk · contribs) 00:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

• GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   • "because of her passion for folk art, this initial display led to the first official public exhibition of folk art in a public showing presentation." Please forgive me, but I am unclear what "presentation" means in this context.
   •  Done Changed to - Because of her passion for folk art, this initial display led to the first official public exhibition of folk art in a demonstration.
   • @Aussie Article Writer: Will that work? --Doug Coldwell (talk)

   • Perfect! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 11:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

1. B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   The following is referenced by a few citations, but when I checked the link, it takes me to an article about Annie Oakley? Are you sure this is the right page? The citation is: James, Edward (1971). Notable American Women, 1607–1950: A Biographical Dictionary. Harvard University Press. p. 645. ISBN 978-0-674-62734-5. W - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 01:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

   I figured out what the situation was. The biography has numerous volumes, the one being linked to was wrong and needed to be changed to Volume 1. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 05:18, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

   Earwig shows no issues.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   • File:Juliana Force.jpg - tagged correctly, fair use rationale is correctly applied
   • File:NY Studio School 8 W8th cloudy jeh.jpg - CC image
   • File:Whitney Museum of American Art original 0000 door.jpg - PD image

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   • File:Juliana Force.jpg - fair use image of the subject
   • File:NY Studio School 8 W8th cloudy jeh.jpg - Whitney Museum of American Art's original building
   • File:Whitney Museum of American Art original 0000 door.jpg - Whitney Museum of American Art's original entrance

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Except for the one referencing issue and a question on one sentence, this is a great nomination for GA! Well done on your hard work. Please clarify the sentence and correct the reference, after which I will check it, if that's good then I am happy to pass. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 01:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

   excellent, this passes GA! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 11:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)