Talk:Gardermoen Line/GA1
(Redirected from Talk:Gardermo Line/GA1)
Latest comment: 15 years ago by The ed17 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi! I'm doing the review at this moment...it shouldn't take long, as I've already read it! (it's very interesting!) Anyway, I'll get back to you soon! Cheers, —the_ed17— 17:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Am I right in thinking that refs at the end of paragraphs cover the entire paragraphs?
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Both Image:Østbanen sjøsiden.jpg and Image:Eidsvoll Verk stasjon Norway.jpg need to be attributed to the authors...
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Any way to expand the lead to cover the controversy that occurred during the building of the railway?
- Do you like my change to the lead? (I don't really know if I like it myself...)
- This article needs a copy-editing to get rid of the dirt underneath its fingernails...could you ask a member of Guild of Copy-Editors to help?
- Ref #7, de-link the author please! (He has no article here....)
- Is there any way to find sources that are in English....? (Not too many people on this side of the pond speak Norwegian or Swedish...)
Anyway, there are a few issues that need to be addressed, so I'll put this on hold for a while...if you need any help, feel free to ask! Cheers, —the_ed17— 17:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review and feedback. I will address the concerns at first opportunity. The change of flow in the lead is good, but I think some of the words are a bit excessive in complexity (in particular geriatric). Ref #7 is a newspaper (not a person) and I will try to make a stub article on it (it definitively deserves one). As for sources, I can look again, but most of the sources are either English or bilingual, and only details that would not reach the international press or international publications are in Norwegian, so I do not think it will be possible to substitute them. If you want them verified, I can get another Norwegian speaker to look at it. Arsenikk (talk) 19:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I gave it a try =)
- Alright, (some guideline somewhere in the caverns of MoS) says that redlinks are allowed if someone is planning to create them, so ok.
- Sorry for giving you this impression, but it's not that I don't believe you! I just wanted to know if it was possible. Apparently it's not, so no problem here. :) I'll keep it on hold until you get rid of my dumb edits to the lead ;D and then it will pass easily. Cheers! —the_ed17— 20:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- I gave the article a copyedit and found two dozen grammar errors, so it may be good enough now, but I can send it on the the league if you still want to (we both want a well written article, but I cannot see my own errors). I swapped an image, and I believe the latter one (of Oslo S) is "attributed in a reasonable manner" by means of attribution if the image is clicked on. As for the paragraph refs, that is a correct assumption (one I believe is in line with WP:CITE). I will now create the Hamar Dagblad stub and the route map. Thanks again for the review, and please comment if there is something I have overseen now. Arsenikk (talk) 20:29, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's good/close enough (and it's the Guild now)... =) I saw these, however:
- "The line is owned by the Norwegian National Rail Administration." Which line? ...or both?
- "The principle of the airport construction..." What does this mean?
- Yes, it is in line with CITE, but I always check to make sure. xD
- Looking good; almost there. —the_ed17— 21:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Those concerns have been addressed now. Arsenikk (talk) 09:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Hey. I'm on Wikibreak until tommorow...only reason why I am on is my mom, but she wants me off and I have to do homework. =/ Plus, I have a RL issue...freakin' girlfriends... I'll take a look at this as soon as I can. Cheers, —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 21:55, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, it looks good. Passing now, so congrats. :) Cheers! —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 23:26, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, and especially with helping the article become a lot better. Your copyedits and feedback are much appreciated. Arsenikk (talk) 18:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- You are welcome. Cheers, —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 18:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC)