Talk:Fringe season 3/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 22:51, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

I'll review. TBrandley • talk • contributions 22:51, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Tick box

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

• Lede: well-received by critics → well received by television critics - Per MOS:TV and MOS:
• Ratings and broadcast: CSI: New York → CSI: NY
• Reviews: Film aggregate review site Metacritic gave the third season 77/100 → Film aggregate review site Metacritic gave the third season 77 out of 100
• References: Ref. 83 - TV By the Numbers → TV by the Numbers

I will try to fix the above issues, or somebody else. However, other than above, I can see this going to FA status, please also nominate for FA, or a peer review, first. TBrandley • talk • contributions 23:10, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Promoted. TBrandley • talk • contributions 23:15, 13 June 2012 (UTC)