Talk:Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt/GA2
(Redirected from Talk:Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt (2019)/GA2)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by DannyS712 in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DannyS712 (talk · contribs) 08:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Review edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Notes edit
- Lede: Who refers to it as Hyatt III? Source please
- Background:
Because an earlier ruling by the Nevada Supreme Court in 2014 had limited FTB's liability to fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress (two torts), the maximum award was set at $100,000.
- What was the earlier ruling? "an earlier ruling in Foo v. Bar by the Nevada Supreme Court in 2014" would help the reader be able to find the case- The court case is cited and quoted from at the end of the sentence (ref 11). Its name is Franchise Tax Bd. v. Hyatt. Does it have to be included in the test, considering the name is almost the same as the name of the SCOTUS case or is it enough if it is cited at the end? --MrClog (talk) 21:33, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Background:
As of May 13, 2019, an appeal is still pending.
- update please - Background:
The U.S. Supreme Court had previously ruled in a similar case, namely the 1979 case Nevada v. Hall.
- awkward phrasing, why "namely"? - "Supreme Court" image caption -
The Supreme Court justices who decided on the 2019 case
- Justices decide a case, not on a case - Notes: Why is the list of 44 states needed?
Discussion edit
I'm placing this on hold pending resolution of the issues noted above --DannyS712 (talk) 21:16, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Per responses above, issues that can be addressed have been. This now passes its good article nomination --DannyS712 (talk) 20:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.