Talk:2011 Finnish parliamentary election/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Plarem (talk • message • contribs • count • logs • email) 15:56, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The notes below are done, the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct and the article complies with Wikipedia's Manual of Style.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   There are enough references, all of them to reliable sources and as far as I can see, the article contains no original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   It has all the major aspects of the election and is focused on only the election.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   The article seems fair to me.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   The article is stable, without any visible edit wars in the last 500 edits.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All are tagged and there were no un-free images, the pictures are appropriately used and have suitable captions.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   – Plarem ^{(User talk contribs)} 17:04, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Notes

Hi, I'm going to review this article for GA. I am not Finnish, so I will learn a bit today about the Finnish electoral system.

Anyway, enough chatter, here are some minor issues which I couldn't fix myself:

From National Coalition Party:

the NCP has been strongly supportive of Finland's participation in EU bailouts with Katainen underlining the importance of what he "European responsibility".

I think that there is a word missing in the Italic text.  Done 213.94.240.18 (talk) 16:57, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

If you find any issues that I didn't find, then please fix them.

Other than that, I find no more issues with the article. If that can be fixed, then I am going to pass it. Until then, on hold for 7 days.

PASSED - Just in the nick of time, tomorrow at four was the deadline; I congratulate you on your achievement and I will change the boxes on the top of the talk page to GA. Once again congratulations and I hope that this will be able to go on to FA standard. – Plarem ^{(User talk contribs)} 17:04, 5 September 2011 (UTC)