Talk:Rejection of evolution by religious groups/Notes

Please read before starting

This talk page is for discussing the text, photographs, format, grammar, etc of the article itself and not the inherent worth of the theory of Evolution. For that, please visit talk.origins or similar forums. Newcomers to Wikipedia and this article may find that it's easy to commit a faux pas. That's OK — everybody does it! You'll find a list of common ones here. Wikipedia policy notes for new editors: A common objection made by new arrivals is that the article presents opponents of the theory of evolution in an unsympathetic light and violates Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View The parts of this policy that apply directly to this article are: Pseudoscience and related fringe theories Undue weight Making necessary assumptions Giving "equal validity". These policies have guided the shape and content of the article, and new arrivals are strongly encouraged to become familiar with them prior to raising objections on this page or adding content to the article. Other important policies guiding the article's content are No original research and Cite your sources. Tempers can flare here. All contributors are asked to please respect Wikipedia's code of civility, including No personal attacks and Abide by consensus. See Wikipedia talk page guidelines. Important pointers for new editors: This article uses scientific terminology, and as such, the use of the word 'theory' to refer to anything outside of a recognised scientific theory is ambiguous. Please use words such as 'concept', 'notion', 'idea', 'assertion'. Please use edit summaries. If you make a suggestion that does not align with a policy, you can expect a pointer to the policy. This is not meant to be rude, but to help smooth the process of building the encyclopedia. If you receive such a pointer, you should take the time to read and understand the policy before re-raising the issue. If you persist in objections to content because of a refusal to accept the consensus or even an inability to understand the issue, your behavior is considered disruptive editing. You should expect your discussions to be archived or userfied, and you may be subject to blocking and sanctions. Please peruse the FAQ or search the archives below, to ensure that you are not rehashing old topics. Old topics resurrected without new evidence are likely to be ignored and archived quickly. Any attempts at trolling, using this page as a soapbox, or making personal attacks may be deleted at any time.