Talk:Midway International Airport/GA1

GA Reassessment

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    I repaired some dead links and tagged 8 dead links using WP:CHECKLINKS
    I see that that the links to [1] and [2], refs # 30 & 31 are live now, must have just been temporarily down. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:58, 17 February 2010 (UTC)  YReply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Just some referencing issues as noted above. On hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be informed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:07, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review if you will give me a little time I will clean up the references. -Marcusmax(speak) 02:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Sure thing, I have the article and review on my watchlist. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:58, 17 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
  Done; all marked sources either repaired or replaced. -Marcusmax(speak) 03:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
  1. OK, that is good to go now, keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply