GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ErrantX (talk · contribs) 22:38, 20 February 2013 (UTC) I'm failing this article for GA as it needs sigificant, and obvious, work. In addition the nominator appears to have conducted no work on the article. Some examples of things that would need looking at:Reply

  • Lead needs expanding
  • There are numerous prose issues from a brief scan (for example; the Legacy section is basically a list and needs work to make it flow).
  • Image placement may need review
  • Section headings may need review (some "blank" sections etc.)
  • Many issues from the first GAR still exist

I hope this will help going forward. --Errant (chat!) 22:38, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply