Talk:Albania–Kosovo relations

POV

Kosovo is still considered internationally a part of the Republic of Serbia, and Serbia considers the region under UN administration. the article completely bypasses such facts. This needs to be fixed. --Russavia ^Dialogue 06:07, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

• As I said on WP:Articles for deletion/Kosovan–Serbian relations, you're being misleading. According to International recognition of Kosovo, 62 out of 192 United Nations members—including 22 out of 27 states in the European Union, 24 out of 28 NATO members and 3 out of 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council—have formally recognized the Republic of Kosovo as an independent state. Also, see [1], [2]. — Rankiri (talk) 16:36, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Abuse of "Unilateral"

I deleted "unilaterally." Declaring independence is by nature unilateral. Nothing is more unilateral than independence. The word is redundant and slanted. Unfortunately, since the invasion of Iraq, the word "unilateral" has been thrown around as an oafish buzzword, and some people seem to think it means the same thing as "bad." Since the word has become loaded, it's suspicious here. I fully recognize that even politicians have been using the word on this subject, but politicians use spin and loaded terminology. If we let the word be used here, we might as well say that all countries that declared independence did so unilaterally, and that Japan unilaterally created a railway-network, and that South Korea unilaterally built up its educational system. Once we realize that "unilaterally" sounds unnecessary in those situations it becomes obvious that its use is a little smear on Kosovo's image. (Ejoty (talk) 10:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC))

Not quite true: Czech Republic and Slovakia became independent, but not by unilateral decision. In this context, "unilateral" means "without reaching an agreement with the other party", which may sound slanted, but is both correct and relevant. GregorB (talk) 15:41, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Albania–Kosovo relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20001204160000/http://www.mfa.gov.al/ to http://www.mfa.gov.al/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Albania

The Embassy of Albania isn't Prishtina but it's Tirana and the Embassy of Kosovo isn't Tirana but Prishtina 2A02:810C:B3F:F07C:1DD4:7403:B1:887A (talk) 14:47, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Source Question

Is this link: https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/short_news/albanian-prime-minister-calls-for-kosovos-integration-into-nato/ Good enough to prove that Albania Supports Kosovo in its NATO-integration path ? Blahhmosh (talk) 22:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)