In mathematics, the symbolic method in invariant theory is an algorithm developed by Arthur Cayley,[1] Siegfried Heinrich Aronhold,[2] Alfred Clebsch,[3] and Paul Gordan[4] in the 19th century for computing invariants of algebraic forms. It is based on treating the form as if it were a power of a degree one form, which corresponds to embedding a symmetric power of a vector space into the symmetric elements of a tensor product of copies of it.

Symbolic notation

edit

The symbolic method uses a compact, but rather confusing and mysterious notation for invariants, depending on the introduction of new symbols a, b, c, ... (from which the symbolic method gets its name) with apparently contradictory properties.

Example: the discriminant of a binary quadratic form

edit

These symbols can be explained by the following example from Gordan.[5] Suppose that

 

is a binary quadratic form with an invariant given by the discriminant

 

The symbolic representation of the discriminant is

 

where a and b are the symbols. The meaning of the expression (ab)2 is as follows. First of all, (ab) is a shorthand form for the determinant of a matrix whose rows are a1, a2 and b1, b2, so

 

Squaring this we get

 

Next we pretend that

 

so that

 

and we ignore the fact that this does not seem to make sense if f is not a power of a linear form. Substituting these values gives

 

Higher degrees

edit

More generally if

 

is a binary form of higher degree, then one introduces new variables a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2, with the properties

 

What this means is that the following two vector spaces are naturally isomorphic:

  • The vector space of homogeneous polynomials in A0,...An of degree m
  • The vector space of polynomials in 2m variables a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2, ... that have degree n in each of the m pairs of variables (a1, a2), (b1, b2), (c1, c2), ... and are symmetric under permutations of the m symbols a, b, ....,

The isomorphism is given by mapping anj
1
aj
2
, bnj
1
bj
2
, .... to Aj. This mapping does not preserve products of polynomials.

More variables

edit

The extension to a form f in more than two variables x1, x2, x3,... is similar: one introduces symbols a1, a2, a3 and so on with the properties

 

Symmetric products

edit

The rather mysterious formalism of the symbolic method corresponds to embedding a symmetric product Sn(V) of a vector space V into a tensor product of n copies of V, as the elements preserved by the action of the symmetric group. In fact this is done twice, because the invariants of degree n of a quantic of degree m are the invariant elements of SnSm(V), which gets embedded into a tensor product of mn copies of V, as the elements invariant under a wreath product of the two symmetric groups. The brackets of the symbolic method are really invariant linear forms on this tensor product, which give invariants of SnSm(V) by restriction.

See also

edit

References

edit
  • Gordan, Paul (1987) [1887]. Kerschensteiner, Georg (ed.). Vorlesungen über Invariantentheorie (2nd ed.). New York York: AMS Chelsea Publishing. ISBN 9780828403283. MR 0917266.

Footnotes

  1. ^ Cayley, Arthur (1846). "On linear transformations". Cambridge and Dublin Mathematical Journal: 104–122.
  2. ^ Aronhold, Siegfried Heinrich (1858). "Theorie der homogenen Functionen dritten Grades von drei Veränderlichen". Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (in German). 1858 (55): 97–191. doi:10.1515/crll.1858.55.97. ISSN 0075-4102. S2CID 122247157.
  3. ^ Clebsch, A. (1861). "Ueber symbolische Darstellung algebraischer Formen". Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik (in German). 1861 (59): 1–62. doi:10.1515/crll.1861.59.1. ISSN 0075-4102. S2CID 119389672.
  4. ^ Gordan 1887.
  5. ^ Gordan 1887, v. 2, p.g. 1-3.

Further reading

edit