Modus ponendo tollens (MPT;[1] Latin: "mode that denies by affirming")[2] is a valid rule of inference for propositional logic. It is closely related to modus ponens and modus tollendo ponens.

Overview

edit

MPT is usually described as having the form:

  1. Not both A and B
  2. A
  3. Therefore, not B

For example:

  1. Ann and Bill cannot both win the race.
  2. Ann won the race.
  3. Therefore, Bill cannot have won the race.

As E. J. Lemmon describes it: "Modus ponendo tollens is the principle that, if the negation of a conjunction holds and also one of its conjuncts, then the negation of its other conjunct holds."[3]

In logic notation this can be represented as:

  1.  
  2.  
  3.  

Based on the Sheffer Stroke (alternative denial), "|", the inference can also be formalized in this way:

  1.  
  2.  
  3.  

Proof

edit
Step Proposition Derivation
1   Given
2   Given
3   De Morgan's laws (1)
4   Double negation (2)
5   Disjunctive syllogism (3,4)

Strong form

edit

Modus ponendo tollens can be made stronger by using exclusive disjunction instead of non-conjunction as a premise:

  1.  
  2.  
  3.  

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Politzer, Guy & Carles, Laure. 2001. 'Belief Revision and Uncertain Reasoning'. Thinking and Reasoning. 7:217–234.
  2. ^ Stone, Jon R. (1996). Latin for the Illiterati: Exorcizing the Ghosts of a Dead Language. London: Routledge. p. 60. ISBN 0-415-91775-1.
  3. ^ Lemmon, Edward John. 2001. Beginning Logic. Taylor and Francis/CRC Press, p. 61.