Proofs of trigonometric identities

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PierreDebuss (talk | contribs) at 12:40, 15 June 2021 (→‎Elementary trigonometric identities). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The main trigonometric identities between trigonometric functions are proved, using mainly the geometry of the right triangle. For greater and negative angles, see Trigonometric functions.

Elementary trigonometric identities

Definitions

 
Trigonometric functions specify the relationships between side lengths and interior angles of a right triangle. For example, the sine of angle θ is defined as being the length of the opposite side divided by the length of the hypotenuse.

The six trigonometric functions are defined for every real number, except, for some of them, for angles that differ from 0 by a multiple of the right angle (90°). Referring to the diagram at the right, the six trigonometric functions of θ are, for angles smaller than the right angle:

 
 
 
 
 
 

Ratio identities

In the case of angles smaller than a right angle, the following identities are direct consequences of above definitions through the division identity

 

They remain valid for angles greater than 90° and for negative angles.

 
 
 
 
 

Or

 
 

Complementary angle identities

Two angles whose sum is π/2 radians (90 degrees) are complementary. In the diagram, the angles at vertices A and B are complementary, so we can exchange a and b, and change θ to π/2 − θ, obtaining:

 
 
 
 
 
 

Pythagorean identities

Identity 1:

 

The following two results follow from this and the ratio identities. To obtain the first, divide both sides of   by  ; for the second, divide by  .

 
 

Similarly

 
 

Identity 2:

The following accounts for all three reciprocal functions.

 

Proof 2:

Refer to the triangle diagram above. Note that   by Pythagorean theorem.

 

Substituting with appropriate functions -

 

Rearranging gives:

 

Angle sum identities

Sine

 
Illustration of the sum formula.

Draw a horizontal line (the x-axis); mark an origin O. Draw a line from O at an angle   above the horizontal line and a second line at an angle   above that; the angle between the second line and the x-axis is  .

Place P on the line defined by   at a unit distance from the origin.

Let PQ be a line perpendicular to line OQ defined by angle  , drawn from point Q on this line to point P.   OQP is a right angle.

Let QA be a perpendicular from point A on the x-axis to Q and PB be a perpendicular from point B on the x-axis to P.   OAQ and OBP are right angles.

Draw R on PB so that QR is parallel to the x-axis.

Now angle   (because  , making  , and finally  )

 
 
 
 
 , so  
 , so  
 


By substituting   for   and using Symmetry, we also get:

 
 

Another rigorous proof, and much easier, can be given by using Euler's formula, known from complex analysis. Euler's formula is:

 

It follows that for angles   and   we have:

 

Also using the following properties of exponential functions:

 

Evaluating the product:

 

Equating real and imaginary parts:

 
 

But this is kind of a circular argument, since proof for Euler's formula requires knowing that the derivative of sine is cosine, which can only be proven by using the identity for the sine of the sum of two angles.

Cosine

Using the figure above,

 
 
 
 , so  
 , so  
 

By substituting   for   and using Symmetry, we also get:

 
 

Also, using the complementary angle formulae,

 

Tangent and cotangent

From the sine and cosine formulae, we get

 

Dividing both numerator and denominator by  , we get

 

Subtracting   from  , using  ,

 

Similarly from the sine and cosine formulae, we get

 

Then by dividing both numerator and denominator by  , we get

 

Or, using  ,

 

Using  ,

 

Double-angle identities

From the angle sum identities, we get

 

and

 

The Pythagorean identities give the two alternative forms for the latter of these:

 
 

The angle sum identities also give

 
 

It can also be proved using Euler's formula

 

Squaring both sides yields

 

But replacing the angle with its doubled version, which achieves the same result in the left side of the equation, yields

 

It follows that

 .

Expanding the square and simplifying on the left hand side of the equation gives

 .

Because the imaginary and real parts have to be the same, we are left with the original identities

 ,

and also

 .

Half-angle identities

The two identities giving the alternative forms for cos 2θ lead to the following equations:

 
 

The sign of the square root needs to be chosen properly—note that if 2π is added to θ, the quantities inside the square roots are unchanged, but the left-hand-sides of the equations change sign. Therefore, the correct sign to use depends on the value of θ.

For the tan function, the equation is:

 

Then multiplying the numerator and denominator inside the square root by (1 + cos θ) and using Pythagorean identities leads to:

 

Also, if the numerator and denominator are both multiplied by (1 - cos θ), the result is:

 

This also gives:

 

Similar manipulations for the cot function give:

 

Miscellaneous – the triple tangent identity

If   half circle (for example,  ,   and   are the angles of a triangle),

 

Proof:[1]

 

Miscellaneous – the triple cotangent identity

If   quarter circle,

 .

Proof:

Replace each of  ,  , and   with their complementary angles, so cotangents turn into tangents and vice versa.

Given

 
 

so the result follows from the triple tangent identity.

Sum to product identities

  •  
  •  
  •  

Proof of sine identities

First, start with the sum-angle identities:

 
 

By adding these together,

 

Similarly, by subtracting the two sum-angle identities,

 

Let   and  ,

  and  

Substitute   and  

 
 

Therefore,

 

Proof of cosine identities

Similarly for cosine, start with the sum-angle identities:

 
 

Again, by adding and subtracting

 
 

Substitute   and   as before,

 
 

Inequalities

 
Illustration of the sine and tangent inequalities.

The figure at the right shows a sector of a circle with radius 1. The sector is θ/(2π) of the whole circle, so its area is θ/2. We assume here that θ < π/2.

 
 
 

The area of triangle OAD is AB/2, or sin(θ)/2. The area of triangle OCD is CD/2, or tan(θ)/2.

Since triangle OAD lies completely inside the sector, which in turn lies completely inside triangle OCD, we have

 

This geometric argument relies on definitions of arc length and area, which act as assumptions, so it is rather a condition imposed in construction of trigonometric functions than a provable property.[2] For the sine function, we can handle other values. If θ > π/2, then θ > 1. But sin θ ≤ 1 (because of the Pythagorean identity), so sin θ < θ. So we have

 

For negative values of θ we have, by the symmetry of the sine function

 

Hence

 

and

 

Identities involving calculus

Preliminaries

 
 

Sine and angle ratio identity

 

In other words, the function sine is differentiable at 0, and its derivative is 1.

Proof: From the previous inequalities, we have, for small angles

 ,

Therefore,

 ,

Consider the right-hand inequality. Since

 
 

Multiply through by  

 

Combining with the left-hand inequality:

 

Taking   to the limit as  

 

Therefore,

 

Cosine and angle ratio identity

 

Proof:

 

The limits of those three quantities are 1, 0, and 1/2, so the resultant limit is zero.

Cosine and square of angle ratio identity

 

Proof:

As in the preceding proof,

 

The limits of those three quantities are 1, 1, and 1/2, so the resultant limit is 1/2.

Proof of compositions of trig and inverse trig functions

All these functions follow from the Pythagorean trigonometric identity. We can prove for instance the function

 

Proof:

We start from

 

Then we divide this equation by  

 

Then use the substitution  , also use the Pythagorean trigonometric identity:

 

Then we use the identity  

 

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2013-10-29. Retrieved 2013-10-30.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) dead link
  2. ^ Richman, Fred (March 1993). "A Circular Argument". The College Mathematics Journal. 24 (2): 160–162. doi:10.2307/2686787. JSTOR 2686787.

References