Stiffness(Redirected from Flexibility)
The complementary concept is flexibility or pliability: the more flexible an object is, the less stiff it is.
The stiffness, k, of a body is a measure of the resistance offered by an elastic body to deformation. For an elastic body with a single degree of freedom (DOF) (for example, stretching or compression of a rod), the stiffness is defined as
- F is the force on the body
- ; is the displacement produced by the force along the same degree of freedom (for instance, the change in length of a stretched spring)
Generally speaking, deflections (or motions) of an infinitesimal element (which is viewed as a point) in an elastic body can occur along multiple DOF (maximum of six DOF at a point). For example, a point on a horizontal beam can undergo both a vertical displacement and a rotation relative to its undeformed axis. When there are M degrees of freedom a M x M matrix must be used to describe the stiffness at the point. The diagonal terms in the matrix are the direct-related stiffnesses (or simply stiffnesses) along the same degree of freedom and the off-diagonal terms are the coupling stiffnesses between two different degrees of freedom (either at the same or different points) or the same degree of freedom at two different points. In industry, the term influence coefficient is sometimes used to refer to the coupling stiffness.
It is noted that for a body with multiple DOF, the equation above generally does not apply since the applied force generates not only the deflection along its own direction (or degree of freedom), but also those along other directions.
For a body with multiple DOF, in order to calculate a particular direct-related stiffness (the diagonal terms), the corresponding DOF is left free while the remaining should be constrained. Under such a condition, the above equation can be used to obtain the direct-related stiffness for the degree of freedom which is unconstrained. The ratios between the reaction forces (or moments) and the produced deflection are the coupling stiffnesses.
A description including all possible stretch and shear parameters is given by the elasticity tensor.
The inverse of stiffness is flexibility or compliance, typically measured in units of metres per newton. In rheology it may be defined as the ratio of strain to stress, and so take the units of reciprocal stress, e.g. 1/Pa.
A body may also have a rotational stiffness, k, given by
- M is the applied moment
- θ is the rotation
Further measures of stiffness are derived on a similar basis, including:
Relationship to elasticityEdit
The elastic modulus of a material is not the same as the stiffness of a component made from that material. Elastic modulus is a property of the constituent material; stiffness is a property of a structure or component of a structure, and hence it is dependent upon various physical dimensions that describe that component. That is, the modulus is an intensive property of the material; stiffness, on the other hand, is an extensive property of the solid body that is dependent on the material and its shape and boundary conditions. For example, for an element in tension or compression, the axial stiffness is
- A is the cross-sectional area,
- E is the (tensile) elastic modulus (or Young's modulus),
- L is the length of the element.
Similarly, the torsional stiffness of a straight section is
Note that in SI, these units yield . For the special case of unconstrained uniaxial tension or compression, Young's modulus can be thought of as a measure of the stiffness of a structure.
The stiffness of a structure is of principal importance in many engineering applications, so the modulus of elasticity is often one of the primary properties considered when selecting a material. A high modulus of elasticity is sought when deflection is undesirable, while a low modulus of elasticity is required when flexibility is needed.
Another application of stiffness finds itself in skin biology. The skin maintains its structure due to its intrinsic tension, contributed to by collagen, an extracellular protein which accounts for approximately 75% of its dry weight. The pliability of skin is a parameter of interest that represents its firmness and extensibility, encompassing characteristics such as elasticity, stiffness, and adherence. These factors are of functional significance to patients. This is of significance to patients with traumatic injuries to the skin, whereby the pliability can be reduced due to the formation and replacement of healthy skin tissue by a pathological scar. This can be evaluated both subjectively, or objectively using a device such as the Cutometer. The Cutometer applies a vacuum to the skin and measures the extent to which it can be vertically distended. These measurements are able to distinguish between healthy skin, normal scarring, and pathological scarring, and the method has been applied within clinical and industrial settings to monitor both pathophysiological sequelae, and the effects of treatments on skin.
- Baumgart F. (2000). "Stiffness--an unknown world of mechanical science?". Injury. Elsevier. 31. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(00)80040-6. Retrieved 2012-05-04.
“Stiffness” = “Load” divided by “Deformation”
- Martin Wenham (2001), "Stiffness and flexibility", 200 science investigations for young students, p. 126, ISBN 978-0-7619-6349-3
- V. GOPALAKRISHNAN and CHARLES F. ZUKOSKI; "Delayed flow in thermo-reversible colloidal gels"; Journal of Rheology; Society of Rheology, U.S.A.; July/August 2007; 51 (4): pp. 623–644.
- Chattopadhyay, S.; Raines, R. (August 2014). "Collagen-Based Biomaterials for Wound Healing". Biopolymers. 101 (8): 821–833. doi:10.1002/bip.22486.
- Ferriero, Giorgio; Di Carlo, Silvia; Salgovic, Ludovit; Bravini, Elisabetta; Sartorio, Francesco; Vercelli, Stefano (2015). "Post-surgical scar assessment in rehabilitation: a systematic review" (PDF). Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2 (1). doi:10.7243/2055-2386-2-2.
- Nedelec, Bernadette; Correa, José; de Oliveira, Ana; LaSalle, Leo; Perrault, Isabelle (2014). "Longitudinal burn scar quantification". Burns. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2014.03.002.