Is there really a copyright? This picture when it's from before the WW2, isn't the copyright then ending in 2007? --134.147.31.187 10:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Without a source one can't tell. If this is indeed German, then copyright expires 70 years after the death of the author, if it's anonymous 70 years after first publication.
- And whatever happened to the idea of citing the source so that anyone can verify that the picture indeed means what we take it to mean. This one looks like a stock de:Weltjudentum squeezing blood from the globe, but the context that it appeared in would still be helpful. Dr Zak 20:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Dr Zak, are you asking for the wider context or simply trying to get rid of the image? ←Humus sapiens ну? 01:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- He tagged it for deletion, [1] when a ten-second Google search would have given him the original source. SlimVirgin (talk) 01:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image%3AOctopusNAS1.jpg&diff=128733419&oldid=75769716){kind=link}
- As usual it's the job of the uploader to make sure his content is watertight. Dr Zak 01:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's your job not to engage in WP:POINT. SlimVirgin (talk) 01:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- You say that every time one of your uploads gets tagged. It's unproductive behavior. Dr Zak 03:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- No, I say it every time one of my uploads gets tagged by you. Please refer any future tagging of my images to someone else. SlimVirgin (talk) 05:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
However it came about I'm glad we have more information on the image. Since the octopus is meant to represent Churchill I think the caption at the new anti-semitism article needs to be reworded. Haukur 11:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Combining tags
edit
Is there any chance we can combine all the copyright tags into one as with File:2001 ed The International Jew by Henry Ford.jpg? -------User:DanTD (talk) 11:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
