"Oh, my risk is just half as high as the risk of an underweight person." -- No, it's not. The y-axis starts at 0.6 for no obvious reason and could easily be extended so that it starts at 0. Very misleading. 87.189.144.25 (talk) 22:16, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Agreed, I came to this talk section just to point out that the graph arbitrarily starts at 0.6. There is no reason for this as starting at 0 would allow a person to actually assess relative risks without the interference of bad graphing. I'd re-make the graph myself right now but it's late ... (Sorry, I don't know how to sign this comment with whatever mechanism Wikipedia uses to identify commenters. But I'm just some random person posting at 11:49 pm PST 2014.04.06) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.66.145.129 (talk) 06:50, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
