Don't womans have pubic hair?
edit
? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.34.87 (talk) 06:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- See hair removal.
- I think what he's getting at, is that it's not an accurate representation of women in their 'natural form'. --82.71.41.74 (talk) 18:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Hair.
edit
Indeed. I wasn't aware that central European women came stock without any body hair. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.91.62.6 (talk) 08:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but, why do you want a big moustache woman? --202.157.40.30 (talk) 05:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Yes, an unshaved woman would be better, to match the unshaved man and to be more scientific. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Partenope (talk • contribs) 09:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
I think the photo is fine the way it is. The man photo is also shaved. Lots of biology textbooks have hairless bodies in them. Do we want a photo of a woman with armpit hair? and leg hair? and pubic hair? Or, a man photo with a beard? and chest hair? and pubic hair? and leg hair? 142.167.163.19 (talk) 17:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
