Surreal. (somebody had to say it) Root4(one) 04:16, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. But what bugs me about the picture is that person... I'm no specialist. But she (or he?) seems to be pasted into the scene :-\ fkm:80.218.176.55 10:55, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Really? I'm not sure what makes you think that. You can see, in the original, that there were two people, one of which is walking away, so there'd be no reason to paste in another person in a rather non-photographically-pleasing pose like he is (the one that was cropped out). GCD1 13:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Is this photo editted (photoshopped) in any way? The contrast and tone seems perfect. Acceptable 15:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- It's been edited in Adobe Photoshop CS2, per the metadata of the image. How much editing? Only the author knows. It was taken with a pretty heavy duty camera, so it should look good by default. I'm sure it was touched up a little bit in Photoshop -- levels, colors, etc. GCD1 20:22, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
It's only a model...
158.36.96.207 (talk) 12:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- How so? The person, the building? -- 122.150.200.116 (talk) 14:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
