- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of a fair use image as a replaceable image. Please do not modify it.
The result was to delete the image. Textbook violation of WP:NFCC#1. — ξxplicit 00:13, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 | This orphaned talk page, subpage, image page, or similar is not eligible for speedy deletion under CSD G8 as it has been asserted to be useful to Wikipedia. If you believe it should be deleted, please nominate it on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. |
you have tagged this file for deletion per CSD F7 (replaceable fair use). I agree that all pictures of living persons are replaceable. They are NOT always replaceable with free images, however. I cannot find a free image for this person, no matter which of the free image or media files I go to. If you could direct me to the source of one then I will not contest the deletion of this one, however, I doubt that you could find one. I searched very thoroughly. It is hard to do a page on someone when the reader has no idea what the subject looks like. I look forward to a free source of images for scientists and doctors such as this person, who is currently living and a well respected researcher. If you find a source please do contact me, but otherwise I feel that this one is as close to free as I could find. Thanking you Ybidzian (talk) 14:23, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Fair use in Anja Cetti Andersen
edit
Though this image is subject to copyright, its use is covered by the U.S. fair use laws because:
- It illustrates an educational article about the book from which the cover illustration was taken.
- The image is used as the primary means of visual identification of the article topic.
- The use of the cover will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original. In particular, copies could not be used to make illegal copies of the book.
- It is a low resolution image.
- It is not replaceable with an uncopyrighted or freely copyrighted image of comparable educational value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ybidzian (talk • contribs) 17:37, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.
