Open main menu
Protein TolC, the outer membrane component of a tripartite efflux pump in Escherichia coli.
AcrB, the other component of pump, Escherichia coli.

Active efflux is a mechanism responsible for moving compounds, like neurotransmitters, toxic substances, and antibiotics, out of cells; a process considered to be a vital part of xenobiotic metabolism. This mechanism is important in medicine as it can contribute to bacterial antibiotic resistance.

Efflux systems function via an energy-dependent mechanism (active transport) to pump out unwanted toxic substances through specific efflux pumps. Some efflux systems are drug-specific, whereas others may accommodate multiple drugs with small multidrug resistance (SMR) transporters.[1][2]


Bacterial efflux pumpsEdit

Efflux pumps are proteinaceous transporters localized in the cytoplasmic membrane of all kinds of cells. They are active transporters, meaning that they require a source of chemical energy to perform their function. Some are primary active transporters utilizing adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis as a source of energy, whereas others are secondary active transporters (uniporters, symporters, or antiporters) in which transport is coupled to an electrochemical potential difference created by pumping hydrogen or sodium ions from or to[clarification needed] the outside of the cell.
Bacterial efflux transporters are classified into five major superfamilies, based on their amino acid sequence and the energy source used to export their substrates:

  1. The major facilitator superfamily (MFS)
  2. The ATP-binding cassette superfamily (ABC)
  3. The small multidrug resistance family (SMR)
  4. The resistance-nodulation-cell division superfamily (RND)
  5. The multi antimicrobial extrusion protein family (MATE).

Of these, only the ABC superfamily are primary transporters, the rest being secondary transporters utilizing proton or sodium gradient as a source of energy. Whereas MFS dominates in Gram positive bacteria, the RND family was once thought to be unique to Gram negative bacteria. They have since been found in all major Kingdoms.


Although antibiotics are the most clinically important substrates of efflux systems, it is probable that most efflux pumps have other natural physiological functions. Examples include:

  • The E. coli AcrAB efflux system, which has a physiologic role of pumping out bile acids and fatty acids to lower their toxicity.[3]
  • The MFS family Ptr pump in Streptomyces pristinaespiralis appears to be an autoimmunity pump for this organism when it turns on production of pristinamycins I and II.
  • The AcrAB–TolC system in E. coli is suspected to have a role in the transport of the calcium-channel components in the E. coli membrane.[4]
  • The MtrCDE system plays a protective role by providing resistance to faecal lipids in rectal isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.[5]
  • The AcrAB efflux system of Erwinia amylovora is important for this organism's virulence, plant (host) colonization, and resistance to plant toxins.
  • The MexXY component of the MexXY-OprM multidrug efflux system of P. aeruginosa is inducible by antibiotics that target ribosomes via the PA5471 gene product.[6]

The ability of efflux systems to recognize a large number of compounds other than their natural substrates is probably because substrate recognition is based on physicochemical properties, such as hydrophobicity, aromaticity and ionizable character rather than on defined chemical properties, as in classical enzyme-substrate or ligand-receptor recognition. Because most antibiotics are amphiphilic molecules - possessing both hydrophilic and hydrophobic characters - they are easily recognized by many efflux pumps.

Impact on antimicrobial resistanceEdit

The impact of efflux mechanisms on antimicrobial resistance is large; this is usually attributed to the following:

  • The genetic elements encoding efflux pumps may be encoded on chromosomes and/or plasmids, thus contributing to both intrinsic (natural) and acquired resistance respectively. As an intrinsic mechanism of resistance, efflux pump genes can survive a hostile environment (for example in the presence of antibiotics) which allows for the selection of mutants that over-express these genes. Being located on transportable genetic elements as plasmids or transposons is also advantageous for the microorganisms as it allows for the easy spread of efflux genes between distant species.
  • Antibiotics can act as inducers and regulators of the expression of some efflux pumps.[6]
  • Expression of several efflux pumps in a given bacterial species may lead to a broad spectrum of resistance when considering the shared substrates of some multi-drug efflux pumps, where one efflux pump may confer resistance to a wide range of antimicrobials.


In eukaryotic cells, the existence of efflux pumps has been known since the discovery of P-glycoprotein in 1976 by Juliano and Ling.[7] Efflux pumps are one of the major causes of anticancer drug resistance in eukaryotic cells. They include monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs), multiple drug resistance proteins (MDRs)- also referred as P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRPs), peptide transporters (PEPTs), and Na+ phosphate transporters (NPTs). These transporters are distributed along particular portions of the renal proximal tubule, intestine, liver, blood–brain barrier, and other portions of the brain.

Efflux inhibitorsEdit

Several trials are currently being conducted to develop drugs that can be co-administered with antibiotics to act as inhibitors for the efflux-mediated extrusion of antibiotics. As yet, no efflux inhibitor has been approved for therapeutic use, but some are being used to determine the prevalence of efflux pumps in clinical isolates and in cell biology research. Verapamil, for example, is used to block P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux of DNA-binding fluorophores, thereby facilitating fluorescent cell sorting for DNA content. Various natural products have been shown to inhibit bacterial efflux pumps including the carotenoids capsanthin and capsorubin,[8] the flavonoids rotenone and chrysin,[8] and the alkaloid lysergol.[9] Some nanoparticles, for example zinc oxide, also inhibit bacterial efflux pumps.[10]

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ Bay, Denice C.; Turner, Raymond J. (2016). Small Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. p. 45. ISBN 978-3-319-39658-3.
  2. ^ Sun, Jingjing; Deng, Ziqing; Yan, Aixin (2014). "Bacterial multidrug efflux pumps: Mechanisms, physiology and pharmacological exploitations". Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 453 (2): 254–67. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.05.090. PMID 24878531.
  3. ^ Okusu, H; Ma, D; Nikaido, H (1996). "AcrAB efflux pump plays a major role in the antibiotic resistance phenotype of Escherichia coli multiple-antibiotic-resistance (Mar) mutants". Journal of Bacteriology. 178 (1): 306–8. PMC 177656. PMID 8550435.
  4. ^ Du, Dijun; Wang, Zhao; James, Nathan R.; Voss, Jarrod E.; Klimont, Ewa; Ohene-Agyei, Thelma; Venter, Henrietta; Chiu, Wah; Luisi, Ben F. (2014). "Structure of the AcrAB–TolC multidrug efflux pump". Nature. 509 (7501): 512–5. Bibcode:2014Natur.509..512D. doi:10.1038/nature13205. PMC 4361902. PMID 24747401.
  5. ^ Rouquette, Corinne; Harmon, Jennifer B.; Shafer, William M. (1999). "Induction of the mtrCDE-encoded efflux pump system of Neisseria gonorrhoeae requires MtrA, an AraC-like protein". Molecular Microbiology. 33 (3): 651–8. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01517.x. PMID 10417654.
  6. ^ a b Morita, Y.; Sobel, M. L.; Poole, K. (2006). "Antibiotic Inducibility of the MexXY Multidrug Efflux System of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Involvement of the Antibiotic-Inducible PA5471 Gene Product". Journal of Bacteriology. 188 (5): 1847–55. doi:10.1128/JB.188.5.1847-1855.2006. PMC 1426571. PMID 16484195.
  7. ^ Juliano, R.L.; Ling, V. (1976). "A surface glycoprotein modulating drug permeability in Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 455 (1): 152–62. doi:10.1016/0005-2736(76)90160-7. PMID 990323.
  8. ^ a b Wang, Q.; Michalak, K.; Wesolowska, O.; Deli, J.; Molnar, P.; Hohmann, J.; Molnar, J.; Engi, H. (2010). "Reversal of Multidrug Resistance by Natural Substances from Plants". Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 10 (17): 1757–68. doi:10.2174/156802610792928103. PMID 20645919.
  9. ^ Cushnie, T.P. Tim; Cushnie, Benjamart; Lamb, Andrew J. (2014). "Alkaloids: An overview of their antibacterial, antibiotic-enhancing and antivirulence activities". International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 44 (5): 377–86. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.06.001. PMID 25130096.
  10. ^ Banoee, Maryam; Seif, Sepideh; Nazari, Zeinab E.; Jafari-Fesharaki, Parisa; Shahverdi, Hamid R.; Moballegh, Ali; Moghaddam, Kamyar M.; Shahverdi, Ahmad R. (2010). "ZnO nanoparticles enhanced antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli" (PDF). Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 93B (2): 557–61. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31615. PMID 20225250.