Talk:Baidya: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
→‎Regarding Vaidya Kulaji text information.: we need neutral & reliable sources only
Line 138:
In saraswat Brahmin Dictionary They also accepted it. However the site is down. I am giving the archived link
https://web.archive.org/web/20141106114015/http://saraswatdirectory.com/saraswat6.php [[User:Abhishek Sengupta 24|Abhishek Sengupta 24]] ([[User talk:Abhishek Sengupta 24|talk]]) 03:05, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 
:Hello [[User:Abhishek Sengupta 24|Abhishek Sengupta 24]], let me tell you first that such sites like saraswatdirectory.com are not considered as reliable at all. What we precisely need are sources by reliable & neutral authors. Same is applicable for Journal of Bengali Studies. Is it a reliable source? Nope. Why? Who is the editor? Tamal Dasgupta, a Baidya, as clearly evident from the surname, who will obviously put forward what the Baidyas claim. Please note that for this purpose, we can't consider it as a neutral & reliable source. Baidyas' claim cannot be validated by such biased sources. Please find neutral and reliable authors for such sensitive claims like connection with Saraswat Brahmins. Moreover, there were other issues as well like selective quotation from the page(s) mentioned. Anyway, since the source is unreliable, I am not discussing any other point at this juncture. Hope you understand, and come up with proper reliable & verifiable sources for improving this article. Thanks. [[User:Ekdalian|Ekdalian]] ([[User talk:Ekdalian|talk]]) 09:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)