Content deleted Content added
→Poorly sourced content: new section |
No edit summary Tags: Manual revert Reverted |
||
Line 46:
::I believe the problem is a poor translation of an older version of the article. This is absolutely a thing that is happening, and while the article itself is in need of an overhaul we shouldn't just outright delete it. There are moments like the [https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/cantonese-08022010104101.html 2010 Cantonese protests in Guangzhou and Hong Kong] after cuts to Cantonese-language broadcasts or the Hong Kong independence protests for example that points to the legitimacy of this article.[[User:Mnidjm|Mnidjm]] ([[User talk:Mnidjm|talk]]) 02:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
:::The deletion discussions on the Chinese Wikipedia cite the exact same issues. There is a difference between an editor(s) citing secondary sources that discuss Cantonese nationalism and an editor(s) citing secondary sources that discuss Cantonese discontent in history and concluding ''unilaterally'' that it is an example of Cantonese nationalism. <big>[[User:Yue|<span style="color:#757575; font-family:Consolas, monospace">''Yue''</span>]][[User talk:Yue|🌙]]</big> 02:33, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
|