Talk:Cantonese nationalism: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted New topic
FCAC2024 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 46:
::I believe the problem is a poor translation of an older version of the article. This is absolutely a thing that is happening, and while the article itself is in need of an overhaul we shouldn't just outright delete it. There are moments like the [https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/cantonese-08022010104101.html 2010 Cantonese protests in Guangzhou and Hong Kong] after cuts to Cantonese-language broadcasts or the Hong Kong independence protests for example that points to the legitimacy of this article.[[User:Mnidjm|Mnidjm]] ([[User talk:Mnidjm|talk]]) 02:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
:::The deletion discussions on the Chinese Wikipedia cite the exact same issues. There is a difference between an editor(s) citing secondary sources that discuss Cantonese nationalism and an editor(s) citing secondary sources that discuss Cantonese discontent in history and concluding ''unilaterally'' that it is an example of Cantonese nationalism. <big>[[User:Yue|<span style="color:#757575; font-family:Consolas, monospace">''Yue''</span>]][[User talk:Yue|🌙]]</big> 02:33, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 
== Poorly sourced content ==
 
@[[User:FCAC2024|FCAC2024]]: Please provide your rationale for your edits, including reinserting poorly sourced content, and don't revert without explaining. Nearly all of the sources I removed are websites like [[Wikipedia:RSPYT|YouTube]], [[Wikipedia:RSPTWITTER|Twitter]], [[Wikipedia:RSPINSTAGRAM|Instagram]] or other unreliable or [[Wikipedia:PRIMARY|primary sources]], which cannot used for this article. [[User:The Account 2|The Account 2]] ([[User talk:The Account 2|talk]]) 18:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)