Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tenderd: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Libraa2019 (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
keep |
||
Line 8:
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Arab Emirates|list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Libraa2019|Libraa2019]] ([[User talk:Libraa2019|talk]]) 18:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
'''Keep''' The subject clearly passes WP:GNG, and all the references are cited in the article such as coverage in [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-18/aramco-vc-fund-joins-thiel-to-back-ai-powered-emissions-monitor Bloomberg], [https://techcrunch.com/2018/08/20/here-are-the-63-startups-that-launched-today-at-y-combinators-s18-demo-day-1/ Tech Crunch], [https://www.businessinsider.com/tenderd-seed-funding-paul-graham-peter-thiel-2019-6 Business Insider], [https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/economy/generation-start-up-tenderd-wants-contractors-to-stop-digging-around-for-equipment-1.904635 The National] etc. But despite that, @Libraa decided to take this to AfD. I'm confident this nomination is driven by retaliation. @Libraa2019 appears to be taking offense to my AfD nominations, [https://afdstats.toolforge.org/afdstats.py?name=Libraa2019&max=&startdate=&altname= where they consistently voted for keeping the articles], only for the discussions to result in ''redirects''. Therefore I suggest SK this under WP:CSK. However, I want to emphasize that such retaliatory behavior is not acceptable. I'm unsure why they're taking this so personally. --—[[User:Saqib|<span style="color:#005080">Saqib</span>]] ([[User talk:Saqib|<span style="color:#700090">talk</span>]] I [[Special:Contributions/Saqib|<span style="color:#996600">contribs</span>]]) 18:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
| |||