Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

(Redirected from Wikipedia:RFP)
"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Shortcuts

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Mizkif

    Reason: Requesting extended-protected for Mizkif article page for frequent violation for WP:BLPPRIVACY of his real name. Also requested to erased his real name from the history logs. see Talk:Mizkif/Archive_1#Real_Name for previous discussion of his real name. Http iosue (talk) 23:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Redacted some of the edits in question. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Church of the Holy Sepulchre

    Reason: extended confirmed protection: falls under WP:CT/A-I Daisytheduck (talk) 23:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Any connection to the Arab Israeli conflict is pretty tenuous. Just because something exists in that part of the world doesn't qualify it for protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    i understand Daisytheduck (talk) 02:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Tinley

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Rapid sockpuppeting attempts to close the discussion. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Bobby Pacquiao

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not even a single constructive edit since the start of 2024. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Israel-related animal conspiracy theories

    Reason: falls under WP:CT/A-I even says that in the talk page Daisytheduck (talk) 03:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Future of Honor

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jdhfox, recreated by sock IP right after previous EC protection expired. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 03:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Atheism sidebar

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same IP keeps making unilateral edits without engaging on the talk page. I have asked them to make an account as well as discuss. They never do. Giving this template edit protection would make the IP actually have to engage with the community. Mason (talk) 03:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    2024–25 Primeira Liga

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Seems to be something like a move war over the past month? IP editor has likely now created an account to continue the disruptive editing. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 04:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Shortcuts

    Ngô Đình Diệm

    Target page is not protected.102.156.71.151 (talk) 17:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Unprotected * Pppery * it has begun... 02:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


    Israel–Hamas war

    Change "Since the start of the Israeli operation, more than 35,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed,[86] including over 15,000 children and 10,000 women.[87][88]" to "Since the start of the Israeli operation, nearly 35,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed,[86] including over 7,000 children and nearly 5,000 women.[87][88]." This is based on the data recently revised by the UN, accessible here: https://www.ochaopt.org/content/hostilities-gaza-strip-and-israel-reported-impact-day-215. ConDissenter (talk) 21:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Is there another place to request this change? The talk page for Israel-Hamas war is restricted as well. The current source for casualty data is palinfo.com, which describes itself by saying it "does not lay any claim to neutrality for it blatantly sides with the oppressed Palestinian people." https://english.palinfo.com/about-us/. Recognizing that reliable sources do not need to have a neutral POV, why should we use this as a source rather than a less biased source like the United Nations? ConDissenter (talk) 18:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @ConDissenter Please go check Talk:Israel–Hamas war for earlier discussions and to see why your request is unlikely to succeed. FYI, the lower numbers refer not to the killed overall but to the killed who have additionally been identified by name. Besides, all the numbers are sourced to Gaza MoH anyway. — kashmīrī TALK 09:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the reply, Kashmiri. I recognize the data is all coming from the same place. (I've tried to access but can't find a reliable site for the Gaza Health Ministry to find the data directly, so I assume the UN is accurately presenting the data.) I agree it hasn't changed the total number killed which is why I didn't suggest a change to that -- beyond fixing the "more than" to "nearly" 35,000. But I don't see any basis for keeping outdated numbers on women and children. The old ratio was 72% and the new ratio was 52%. The talk page suggests we need to wait for more RS, but at this point there are plenty:
    https://www.npr.org/2024/05/15/1251265727/un-gaza-death-toll-women-children
    https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/13/middleeast/death-toll-gaza-fatalities-un-intl-latam/index.html
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/gaza-women-children-death-toll-1.7203167
    Is there any way to flag this for the editors of that page, even on the Talk page? ConDissenter (talk) 23:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The text of the article has now gotten worse. It says "Since the start of the Israeli operation, more than 35,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed, including over 15,000 children and 10,000 women. Over 10,000 others are missing and presumed trapped under rubble." This implies either that there are 45,000 killed total, or ALL of the 25,000 identified are women and children. I've been following Talk:Israel–Hamas war on this subject and the contributors seem to be talking at loggerheads. How is this supposed to work? Now the text of the article is at odds with most RS. E.g., https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/what-we-know-about-the-death-toll-in-gaza/ar-BB1mzqUT. ConDissenter (talk) 23:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=1224900187"