User talk:SL93/Archive 2

Welcome to the Films Project

Welcome!

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

• The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for August has been published. September's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
• Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
• Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Collectonian

-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:18, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILM September Election Voting

The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

for fixing this error.  pablo_hablo. 13:15, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Re:UAA

Sorry about that, I just used twinkle to save myself the time. ceranthor 01:43, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

RFC

Given your view, I'm having a hard time determining what part of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/A Nobody#Outside view by Kww you disagree with. In general, it's better to support an existing view than to split off a new view that is nearly the same.—Kww(talk) 17:53, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

"I hate to admit it, but this drama is entertaining. Joe Chill (talk) 01:07, 21 September 2009 (UTC)" Smile when you say that, son :) I did. ++Lar: t/c 01:12, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

I'd have sent an email but you say you don't check. If people (even other admins) truly are harassing (badgering you on wiki... I can't really help with real life harassment) you, ask for admin assistance. My talk page is always open. I may blow you off, but I have 300+ talk page watchers. If what you bring to me is legit, it will be dealt with. If it's not legit it will be too. I hope that is of some help to you. ++Lar: t/c 02:15, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

You misread me

I didn't side with them. The problem is that they are a fact of life. I can't block them, because I'm not an admin. I can't go on the attack, because there are too many of them, and the situation isn't black-and-white. This isn't an easy problem where I can offer you a piece of advice that will fix everything, or dole out some punishment that will fix everything.

I gave you a friendly offer, and I meant it: when you are in these discussions and feel provoked, drop me a message. I'll look over your situation, and give you the best advice I can for dealing with that situation. That was meant in all friendliness, and the offer is still open.—Kww(talk) 03:39, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Skyscraper Project

Re. your PROD of Skyscraper Project, I changed it to an AfD as it's a recreation of an article that was previously deleted following my own PROD of it. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  18:07, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

AGF

I'm sorry if you took my asking for your motivation (which you still have not disclosed) as a personal attack. It was not intended as such.

I put "wiki-lawyering" in my edit summary to summarize my comment, as I was quoting our exact policy. I have no idea why you think I was accusing you of wiki-lawyering, but apologize for any confusion that might be my fault.

Please be careful about throwing around accusations of my assuming bad faith, though. We both need to heed WP:AOBF. --Karnesky (talk) 00:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Articles for Deletion Barnstar
		In recognition of your dedicated work at WP:AFD and to honor your tireless defense of high standards on Wikipedia. With my respect, RayTalk 20:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Timeline on explosion articles

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Evosoho&oldid=316376725

Let me know if I missed anything. Ikip (talk) 22:05, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Moved from user talk:ikip

In the species article, he removed my rescue template with an edit summary that said that it was canvassing. That's the only other thing that I see that you have missed. Joe Chill (talk) 22:11, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

I noticed that. I will add it, if he hasn't deleted my section yet. thanks. 22:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

You might want to consider taking the problems involving this editor to AN/I. Considering our general positions on deletion, more appropriately you than me. DGG ( talk ) 23:07, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

I agree, he seems to be on some kind of mission, which is a bit worrying.  pablo_hablo. 23:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

It has been brought to ANI. Joe Chill (talk) 23:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

I wrote the evidence section as a warning, and as a timeline for other editors to use if the editor continues to do what he is doing.

He has archived his talk page [right before I wrote the timeline]. I think he may have stepped away from all of this. If there is anything more I can do to help, please let me know. Ikip (talk) 23:56, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

With issues including what happened before this incident, I doubt that he is done. Joe Chill (talk) 23:59, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

I added on to what you said. Joe Chill (talk) 00:07, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

From User talk:ikip:

Sorry for using what you wrote in a way that wasn't intended. Joe Chill (talk) 01:01, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

no need to apologize, maybe this is the best approach. No hard feelings. :) Keep on letting the ARS know about articles you are concerned about. Ikip (talk) 01:23, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Other matter

RE: Wikipedia_talk:Article_Rescue_Squadron#WOW There is no policy that forbids this, in fact I have thoroughly documented that other wikiprojects do this constantly, even with Arbcom and admin elections.

That said, it is better to simply ignore questions and challenges about notifying others, as "edits begat edits" and you won't change anyone's mind.

In a recent AFD, I was quite open about notifying all of the editors in a previous AFD. That way no one could accuse me of hiding something or try to get me in a "gotcha".

Next time you do this, I suggest publicly announcing to everyone in the AFD that you have notified the ARS, like editors now do with deletion discussions:

*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites|list of Websites-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 19:59, 20 September 2009 (UTC)<!--Template:Delsort--></small>[1]

Ikip (talk) 22:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Proper ARS tagging of an article, requesting assistance in improving an article, is never to be perceived as canvassing. Posting a reminder at the ARS talk page is then never required, as active members will have already noted the ARS tag, and inactive members won't notice. So adding a note there is completely unneccessary. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 00:04, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

I have mentioned your entanglement here

Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#User:Tothwolf. It may interest you. After I posted the notice there, I saw that you had independently posted to ANI. Miami33139 (talk) 19:18, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Leafpad

I hadn't had a chance to reply on the Leafpad AfD yet but I thought you might be interested in this. See this section on my talk page. --Tothwolf (talk) 00:36, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

That AFD is too filled with attacks that I'm not bothering with that AFD. Joe Chill (talk) 00:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Which AfD? --Tothwolf (talk) 00:46, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

The leafpad AFD. You retracted what you said, but with those comments there, it makes it simpler for editors to attack me. Especially because I don't think that it shows notability. Joe Chill (talk) 00:48, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

What exactly did I retract on the Leafpad AfD? I still think you may be pushing the envelope a little too far when it comes to nominating many of these software articles, and yes, I am familiar with when it began and why, and that does make it hard to AGF. How about this, if and when you decide to start improving software articles rather than trying to have them wiped away, please feel free to contact me on my talk page.
--Tothwolf (talk) 01:09, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

The reason isn't because of my articles being nominated for deletion! I just have different ways of trying to help on Wikipedia. You're not familiar so stop your bad faith assuming lies. What is your problem with assuming bad faith? Don't say shit without proof. I won't talk to you about software because I do not agree with your opinion and you constantly assume bad faith. Now I'm not being civil and with good reason. Joe Chill (talk) 01:11, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

It isn't bad faith, and for what its worth I think some of the people who gave you a hard time were wrong for doing so (some of that looked horrible). I don't disagree with all of your nominations, I disagree when you nominate something that either has coverage, can be improved via regular editing, or can be merged into a larger parent article. --Tothwolf (talk) 01:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

I don't like it when people say that they know something without any proof (You have no idea how often that is). That's my point. We disagree! It's common for people to disagree with each other. Joe Chill (talk) 01:27, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

I wouldn't want to link to those old diffs, you've tried to get away from all of that and all things considered I don't have a problem with that. Have you read the article on FUTON bias? Many of the articles I work on are related to software that predate Google and even the World Wide Web (yes, we really did have the Internet before the WWW was thought of). What this means is it isn't always possible to find things for these articles with Google. I'm often having to dig through old Usenet archives and compressed archives from old FTP mirrors. This doesn't mean coverage for something does not exist – it just means it can't always be found with something like a Google search (and I'll admit right now, I like Google). --Tothwolf (talk) 01:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

People have different ways of searching. Joe Chill (talk) 01:41, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Indeed, and the methods usually (and often should) vary depending on the subject at hand. Can we at least agree that we are both trying to improve Wikipedia but we just have different backgrounds? --Tothwolf (talk) 01:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes. This issue has went on longer then when MichaelQSchmidt and I was trying to stop sockpuppets from attacking me. Joe Chill (talk) 01:46, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

(←) Certainly never a fun thing to have to deal with. You probably understand about how I feel about the whole situation I've been documenting on AN/I. How should we resolve the stuff on the Leafpad AfD? Should I post a followup comment there indicating that we have resolved our differences? I still think we should bring up the popcorn numbers there for others to mull over and consider. --Tothwolf (talk) 02:01, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

I think that the follow-up comment will be good. I'm fine with you bringing up the popcon numbers on AFD. You didn't need to ask me for the second one. Joe Chill (talk) 02:05, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Done, [2] I'll see about posting something on AN/I as well. --Tothwolf (talk) 02:47, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Also done [3] --Tothwolf (talk) 03:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

• Sorry to interject, but kudos for resolving the differences! A common base has been re-established, and there is one less drama on WP. :) --Mokhov (talk) 04:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

78violet

Hello. I saw you removed that legal threat. I have seen users banned before for making threats, is it worth it to recommend User:Xxspirit4musicxx for a ban? I'm not familar with the policies or procedures of it, only vaugly aware of it happening before.--TParis00ap (talk) 16:15, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

A Treeful Of Secrets

can you please give me a little more time, it is going under editing and changes. --Koolspeed (talk) 18:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films September 2009 Newsletter

The September 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:33, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FanFiction.Net

Why is it that so often, an article has to be sent to AFD before anyone can be bothered to dig up sources? Good work, now please do add them. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Pages (EP) deletion

Please could you explain what you mean by I can't find significant coverage for this album, regarding deletion of Pages (EP)? I don't quite understand.. Are you talking about citing references? Downloadmeh (talk) 19:32, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

AFD

Don't be disheartened by the feedback at ANI. Your intentions were good, and even the close itself was justifiable on its merits alone. However we not only have to be fair, but also seen to be fair. It was good of you to bring this up at ANI and no harm was done. Cheers and happy editing. Abecedare (talk) 11:57, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Your comments at ANI

There is no need for this comment, "Are you such a dick in real life?" and no matter what someone else has said, you should not say that, it would be better if you struck it or removed it. Off2riorob (talk) 21:59, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

I don't know the history but it is our individual comments that reflect back on us, if someone else has done something then that is their problem, we are only responsible for our actions and saying ..he was nasty is not a reason to be nasty ourselves, it is up to you, it was only a friendly suggestion, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 22:09, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm not going to template you, but please do read {{Uw-npa2}} and consider this a friendly and advisory notice that calling another user a dick is completely out of line, no matter what they've done to you in the past (two wrongs don't make a right etc. and some other cliches). I'm sure you were provoked, but you could just as easily have responded, "Was that comment helpful?" for example, which is slightly sarcastic, but much less abrasive than what you actually posted. Thanks for reading ;) ╟─TreasuryTag►cabinet─╢ 22:21, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Because he doesn't need to be templated, he knows the rules and deliberately breaks them. He needs blocks. That's my opinion, but I know I'm in the minority! ╟─TreasuryTag►without portfolio─╢ 22:24, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

As I said, I don't know the history, sometimes it is good to drop the past and start anew, anyway, stay cool. Off2riorob (talk) 22:25, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Help

{{helpme}}

How do I create categories? Joe Chill (talk) 16:07, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

To add a category to a page, whether it "exists" (has been used before) or not, just type [[Category:Burmese dentistry colleges]] or whatever. If you want to add text to the category page, simply click on the redlink that will be created when you do the above, and edit the page. Hope this helps! ╟─TreasuryTag►directorate─╢ 16:12, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

It's obviously more than that: Category:2006 televison series. Joe Chill (talk) 16:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Any page you want to add to the category, just type [[Category:2006 televison series]] onto the page. If you want to edit the category itself, click here to do it. It's actually designed to be very easy. ╟─TreasuryTag►sundries─╢ 16:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

I want to create a category. Joe Chill (talk) 16:25, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

I've explained how you create a category. There are two elements to a category existing (ie. having been created). It has pages in it, and it has a short description on its own page. I've told you how to do both of those things. Read WP:CAT, or ask for further clarification, if you're still unsure. ╟─TreasuryTag►UK EYES ONLY─╢ 16:29, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

What did I do wrong? Joe Chill (talk) 16:31, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

You haven't done anything wrong. Now you need to put some pages into it, which you need to do manually. Find a page you want to put in it (say, Doctor Who (series 2)), edit that page and insert the text [[Category:2006 televison series]] – easy! ╟─TreasuryTag►without portfolio─╢ 16:34, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

I've fixed it. Giano (talk) 16:35, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

No, you didn't. I had a link to the category on The Imp (televison series) during the whole discussion and it still isn't there. Joe Chill (talk) 16:36, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, he did. You mis-spelt it as televison, he fixed it. It works now. The Imp is in there. ╟─TreasuryTag►without portfolio─╢ 16:37, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Spelling mistakes-one of the biggest evils. Joe Chill (talk) 16:38, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

I deleted the category with the typo in the title (although I ended up entering the wrong CSD reason ... oops.) Abecedare (talk) 16:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Deleted the non-typo category too, since you asked. Abecedare (talk) 16:49, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Note: There are already categories on Category:Television series by decade and Category:Television series debuts by year with lots of related subcategories, and currently it is not clear how the new category you created fits in, and what its inclusion criterion is. It would be a good idea to consult with related wikiprojects or editors before proceeding further. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 16:43, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

My first attempt at creating a category was a fail. I added csd-g7 to it. Joe Chill (talk) 16:48, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Be bold is not just a slogan. Now you at least know how to create cetegories, for the next time you need to. Abecedare (talk) 16:52, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

You may find the WP:HOTCAT tool useful for searching and adding categories to articles. It is very easy to install too - "just go to your preferences and check the HotCat option in the Gadgets tab". Abecedare (talk) 16:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Philippine Aid Society

Philippine Aid Society This is a strange one. You would think that there would be some newspaper coverage for this organization. I couldn't find anything, except their own announcements and blogs which refer to content created by the organization itself. patsw (talk) 16:30, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

I need some hand holding

hey,

I would you mind being my PROD and AFD mentor for a while, just untill i get the hang of it. The thing that confuses me the most is weather to use PROD or AFD. can you give me any advice? Tim1357 (talk) 03:07, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Help

{{helpme}} How do I add Category:Books about child abuse to Category:Child abuse as a subcategory? Joe Chill (talk) 20:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Edit Category:Child abuse and add Category:Books about child abuse to the other categories listed. Fred Talk 21:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

I tried to, but all that I got was categories for the category. There is no edit button on the subcategory section. Joe Chill (talk) 21:08, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Edit Category:Books about child abuse to add it to Category:Child abuse, just as you would to put an article in a category. Algebraist 21:11, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Done. I added the category. Tim Song (talk) 21:12, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I had it backwards. Fred Talk 21:14, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Tim. Joe Chill (talk) 21:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Sense of Humour

Joe although we seem to disagree a lot, I do enjoy your sense of humour. Also I like the majority of your edits. Keep up the good work. - Ret.Prof (talk) 13:24, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

RFA spam

Thank you for participating in WP:Requests for adminship/Kww 3
Sometimes, being turned back at the door isn't such a bad thing

—Kww(talk) 18:30, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Cheetle AfD

Thanks for letting me know. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Media mention

I removed the mention of PhoneNews.com - it was deleted via speedy deletion, not AfD. And is it really a media mention? Fences&Windows 23:43, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Prod?

Hi Joe - I just commented on two AFDs that've sat idle for a while, where you were the nom. PROD might be a better way to go about these things, if the interest is so low. Best, Ray^Talk 23:27, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Awarded for your hard work in examining sources at AfD. This was the one that prompted me to give you a barnstar, but there are countless others. Keep it up!—S Marshall Talk/Cont 23:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Your userpage

I'm not sure if after arguing yourself that celebrating someone's death in userspace isn't really appropriate, that hosting the statement on your userpage is a good idea. The basic point you're making doesn't require the actual text of the box to be quoted. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 23:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up

Unfortunately I read it too late. Man, I hate how Wikipedians sometimes just doubt that you're trying to contribute like you'd just make some shit up for the hell of it. That documentary (Kung-Fu Killers) came out shortly after Fight Science, and National Geographic have made a ton of documentaries on martial arts. This is why I hardly contribute anymore, most of my time is spent on the martial arts wiki.

Anyway, sorry about the rant. Again, thanks or the heads up. Dessydes (talk) 05:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Paranoid

Re "You sound paranoid." [4] I suggest you strike out your comment on that DRV.

Paranoia: "Paranoia is a thought process heavily influenced by excessive anxiety or fear, often to the point of irrationality and delusion."

This new AfD [5] of an article we've been expanding and adding sources to pretty much disproves your theory of "paranoia". Note that this AfD was created by the individual that targeted me because I added sources to articles and had many kept at AfD. With the mass-AfD, he was a meatpuppet canvassed by the other individual (the diff links are on the AN/I). I know he monitors my contribs and saw my comment about the other individual at DRV.

--Tothwolf (talk) 13:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

The ANI report didn't have a result. Joe Chill (talk) 20:10, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, not one immediately visible anyway. --Tothwolf (talk) 20:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

I'd been thinking about adding that comment for a week or so; it was not specifically aimed at you. DS (talk) 20:28, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey

You'll probably be interested in this. I think it's probably worth having a discussion, even after the added sources, to establish what the rest of the community thinks - it'll help gauge whether similar articles should be speedied at all. henrik•talk 20:54, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for Janet Allison

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Janet Allison. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Power.corrupts (talk) 12:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Help

I can't get the third references on Polymixia nobilis to work. Joe Chill (talk) 23:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

doneHell In A Bucket (talk) 23:46, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Added more descriptive title. Main point was, you forgot "http:" Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 23:48, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Actually, Hell in a Bucket did that when he tried to fix it. What I added was "Marine Species. http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=127163. Retrieved 2009-11-06." as a formatted ref. Joe Chill (talk) 23:49, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

The {{cite web}} was just missing the |title= parameter. --Tothwolf (talk) 23:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NovaDB

Out of curiosity, why did you say you can't find significant coverage for this "film" in an AfD discussion relating to computer software? Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 01:24, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

GPRO and all that

Hi. Re User:Joe Chill#Stuff found the web about my account: have a look at User:Antandrus/observations on Wikipedia behavior. It's all worth reading, but you'd particularly appreciate #49:

The highest compliment a troll can pay to you is to create an attack page about you elsewhere on the internet. It's as close to an admission of surrender as you will get, in addition to showing that you are doing something very right indeed. As in on-wiki trolling, the insults they choose tell you more about them than about you. Consider such pages to be monuments to your good work, but otherwise ignore them.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: The Center of Hope

Hello Joe Chill, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of The Center of Hope - a page you tagged - because: Not unambiguously promotional. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. NW (Talk) 21:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

The Center of Hope

I was able to find some references for The Center of Hope by including the name of the town in my Google News archive search. You may wish to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Center of Hope. -- Eastmain (talk) 05:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/File Access Manager

No harm intended! Bearian (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

I can't find significant coverage for this _______.

Most of the time you always say this sentence with a change in the last part of the sentence as if you think of it as your own catchphrase. ☭Pickbothmanlol☭ 17:48, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Finding significant coverage

You may be able to access additional databases of articles from reliable sources through your local library's website. Many libraries subscribe to various databases that can be accessed through their website, but only by people with a valid library card number. You can also search for references at http://www.findarticles.com or http://www.accessmylibrary.com I hope this will allow you to use the phrase I like to use in AFD discussions: "Keep. I added some references." -- Eastmain (talk) 15:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Megarex

Hi, Joe Chill! I saw you voted for deleting Megarex. In fact, it had no references. I added some references I found about this band and its importance to Brazilian music and, then, I explained the reasons to keep the article in Wikipedia, according to band. Take a look there, please. I hope you change your opinion about that. Thank you!Victor Silveira (talk) 02:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Trying to be helpfull in spite of my anger.

You may want to use {{delsort}} for your AfD nomination of Internal Suffering. -- allen四names 03:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Regarding CNFan12

Two things:

• I've nominated Nickelodeon 3d Movie Maker 2, an article by CNFan12, for deletion. Does it meet any speedy deletion requirements?
• You've speedy deleted two other articles by the same user. Should we keep an eye on this user's posts?

--Delta1989 (talk/contributions) 02:39, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. Though it doesn't meet CSD, I'll still keep it up for deletion. Is someone watching CNFan12's posts? --Delta1989 (talk/contributions) 02:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

I'll keep an eye on him; it'll give me something to take care of here on Wikipedia. --Delta1989 (talk/contributions) 02:51, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Loan me an eye?

I am hoping you might be able to revisit the Ashes to Ashes (2010 film) article, as its been modified some over the last few hours. Perhaps you might be able to offer input toward its continued improvement? Thank you, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:23, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Blue Orchestra

Wow, good job! Bearian (talk) 19:48, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Bearian (talk) haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!

Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk paj with friendly messuj to all.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bless (Hip hop artist)

Your AfD notice on my talk page missed the actual target. While the history does indeed show that I made that page, what I created there was a redirect from Bless to Blessing. Since then, it's apparently been moved and edited. Looks like User:HIPHOPNYC is who you want. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 00:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

No prob. I was on my way to put an AfD message on their talk page, but if you're on, I'm going to start dinner.... - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 00:56, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

inre THIS...

Darn you're fast. :) 02:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)