Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Cooney Cilella (May 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jamiebuba were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 07:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for reminded me about it. Rubygillman722 (talk) 10:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Rubygillman722! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 07:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Rubygillman722. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Desanimade per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Desanimade. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spicy (talk) 22:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rubygillman722 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I tried to create an new article using the draft, unfortunately it was declined because it read more like an advertisement, I moved on to editing other articles, but i got blocked unfortunately because I was framed by Barry Wom because of suspicious sockpuppeting due to my past actions, but i am 100 percent proven innocent that this account is unrelated to the sockmaster, and I haven’t edited on Wikipedia for a month now.

Decline reason:

"Proven innocent"? Not so. Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rubygillman722 (talk) 23:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply