Talk goes here.

Please watch

edit

Please watch amygdala. Thank you. Koalabyte 02:21, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Shoulder

edit

Hi there: there is nothinh wrong with those short stub articles , but why not write a full-length article on the Shoulder Joint?--Anthony.bradbury 21:10, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Because the shoulder joint is too complex for a single article. Please see the anatomy project. Mauvila 21:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page.

Medicine

edit

I've noticed that you've been editing medicine related articles --from your contributions. We have a place where the medically minded people hang out: WikiProject "Clinical Medicine". You are invited to join or just browse the talk page, which is also known as the doctors' mess.

If your interests are in nephrology, GI or pre-clinical medicine-- there are projects specifically for those things.

If you're looking for info on how to do references see WP:CLINMED/Writing_medical_articles. I look forward to more of your edits. Nephron  T|C 02:35, 23 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Anatomy

edit

Thanks for all your work on the anatomy articles. --Arcadian 23:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's no problem for me. I have a gross anatomy test coming up on all the articles I am editing, so it really is a great review. Mauvila 00:00, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ampulla of Vater

edit

Hi Mauvila, sure, that's no problem. I just wasn't sure whether you guys were organizing based on proper anatomical names or the names actually used. Cheers -- Samir धर्म 03:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Biceps brachii muscle

edit

Thank you for your clarification on the Biceps brachii page. I've been working to gather information and rewrite bits (which I have not yet added), but couldn't figure out how best to fix the confusing text about the triarticulation of the biceps. --EncycloPetey 01:48, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

No problem Mauvila 19:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tooth

edit

Hey, I noticed you were involved with Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy, and I need some feedback! I had asked a question about the Tooth article because I do not know what would be the best way to deal with information on human vs animal teeth. Most of the information is about human teeth. So, should there be a separate "animal teeth" article that the section should show as the main article or should the majority of the content in the tooth article be moved to a "human tooth" (or would this be an exception to have plural: "human teeth") article? What are your thoughts on the matter? My initial instinct was to keep the article as is and make a new article about animal teeth for the section to refer to, but I did not know if most anatomy articles try to keep a certain format when addressing that issue. I have had one suggestion to move most of the information to a "human tooth" or "human teeth" article. I would appreciate any ideas. Thanks! - Dozenist talk 13:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Aquaretics

edit

I have elaborated on your initial objections listed on talk:aquaretics and have cited sources describing what the term "aquaretic" really means as well as others which summarily reject the alternative remedies listed as aquaretics, by the technical definition (although one or two are actually diuretics.) Your comment would be greatly appreciated, as would your input on how to improve the (currently dismal, inaccurate, and unsourced) article. --Kajerm (talk) 07:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've addressed your comments on talk:aquaretics. --Kajerm (talk) 04:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

edit

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Feel free to participate in the journal.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reach wikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

DiptanshuTalk 06:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Mauvila. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pancolitis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Mauvila. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply