User talk:Gogo Dodo/Archive 32

Latest comment: 10 years ago by EvergreenFir in topic Question - ANI or Sock?


Req for un-deletion of page

Hi I was trying to create page in reference to Prashant Singh. There is a lot of news and media coverage and ppl were looking for his details. Pls see some of the links below and see if you can restore it or make it better. Thanks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prashant_Pratap_Singh


References

collapse large link list

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/veena-malik-s-alleged-exboyfriend-files-a-complaint-against-her/1214107/ http://www.ndtv.com/article/cities/mumbai-ex-lover-files-complaint-against-veena-malik-for-threatening-him-464817 http://www.masala.com/did-veena-malik-cheat-her-boyfriend-before-marrying-asad-bashir-khan-khattak-in-dubai-151174.html http://www.indiatvnews.com/entertainment/bollywood/veena-malik-calls-prashant-singh-gay-and-brother-11102.html http://daily.bhaskar.com/article-hf/ENT-veena-malik-claims-alleged-lover-prashant-singh-pratap-is-just-a-gay-staffer-4480370-PHO.html http://www.emirates247.com/entertainment/betrayal-fraud-story-behind-veena-malik-s-quick-dubai-wedding-2013-12-30-1.532918 http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/veena-malik-complaint-prashant-singh-asad-khan-khattak-ashmit-patel/1/333592.html http://www.bollywoodlife.com/news-gossip/veena-maliks-ex-boyfriend-files-case-against-her/ http://newsmedia247.com/prashant-singh-files-complaint-veena-malik-68140 http://daily.bhaskar.com/article-hf/ENT-veena-malik-claims-alleged-lover-prashant-singh-pratap-is-just-a-gay-staffer-4480370-PHO.html https://tune.pk/video/1622702/Veena-Malik-shocks-her-live-in-boyfriend-Prashant-Singh-by-getting-married http://www.indiatvnews.com/entertainment/bollywood/veena-malik-ex-beau-files-police-complaint-against-her-11092.html http://www.bollywoodmantra.com/news/newly-wed-veena-malik-threatens-ex-lover/13546/ http://www.koimoi.com/bollywood-news/ex-boyfriend-files-suit-against-veena-malik/ http://www.saharasamay.com/entertainment-news/676545363/prashant-pratap-singh-claims-that-veena-malik-was-pregnant-veena.html http://daily.bhaskar.com/article-ht/ENT-veena-malik-was-pregnant-with-my-child-prashant-pratap-singh-4481097-PHO.html http://www.ibtimes.co.in/articles/532246/20131230/veena-malik-ex-boyfriend-police-complaint-case.htm

and more. Pls let me know. Rocky S — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merockys (talkcontribs) 15:41, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

WP:BLP1E seems to apply here. This person is only being mentioned in connection to one event (some sort of spat between these him and veena malik). If this is so, an article should probably not be created. He appears to be a low profile individual, and this event is not really significant. It seems unlikely that coverage of this will persist. Benboy00 (talk) 16:46, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

The issues is been going on from a week and expected to only grow. The videos on youtube confirm that. He is a three businesses an working on many film projects etc. I am following him closely. See his twitter https://twitter.com/iPrashantSingh He has even signed 2 films. News would be out. I again know as i follow his facebook. https://www.facebook.com/prashantsingh1

Since we would need to create a page eventually. Merockys (talk) 22:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:46, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

No common reason

Hello, I just want to add that article to explain people regarding its concept. It can be very useful to people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhwalin (talkcontribs) 08:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:33, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Nicola Majocchi

I really don't understand how this works, I must say it is not easy in fact rather complicated. I would so much appreciated if you would simply explain me why you deleted my article so perhaps I can correct what needs to be corrected. Thanks, Nicola Majocchi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.248.212 (talk) 22:20, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:30, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

V.I.S. - VOX page deleted

Dear Gogo Dodo. You made a big mistake by deleting V.I.S. - VOX band page. You didn't even let me finish the article. It's new rock band, but it has great individual references. Its members are experienced and respectable rock band artists in the Macedonian and Balcan's music scene. There are former members of the best macedonian rock band Arhangel. V.I.S. - VOX has just published it's first CD and many people are interested in band's work and looking for information about this band. On the other hand, there are many accepted articles at en.wikipedia about anonymous and insignificant macedonian artists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LandB (talkcontribs) 23:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I have followed your t&c

Hello,

I need to create article for www.5x5cm.com, I do not want to put article on wikipedia for advertisement. But if wikipedia allow me to put article regarding 5x5cm.com website, it will be very helpful to people who really want to know about website.

5x5cm.com website is mainly created for merchants who can not afford to develop ecommerce website. So 5x5cm.com is a best way to start online business and start earnings. On other side, for buyers or users, they can buy their necessary things in life from merchants.

But first of all, I need to explain about that website and I found wikipedia is best way for that. So I am requesting you to undelete my article or give me idea contents which will not violence your t&c.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhwalin (talkcontribs) 04:39, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppet of User:Sayan Basu

Recently you blocked the User:Sayan Basu for holding sockpuppets. I suspect another user User:Kate Cruise to be a sockpuppet of Sayan Basu, based on edit history and vandalism on similar articles. I am not much familiar with WP:SPI process. Can you have a look whether this will be a fit case for investigation and initiate necessary processes. Amartyabag TALK2ME 09:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:26, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
The apparent reason was I removed certain information from the article Jalpaiguri (I think he belongs from that place) which apparently looked like factual errors and asked him not to refer Jalpaiguri as a city [1]. Cooch Behar is my home town and has been mentioned on my userpage, I think he has a grudge over that. I have detected another user User:Anurag Aryya who surprisingly blanked the page Jalpaiguri, which seems to be another sockpuppet of Sayanbasu (may be to confuse the admins) or an edit warring account of some other user. I have asked for a Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sayan Basu though I don't know how to handle most of the queries. May be you can have a look. Amartyabag TALK2ME 07:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the help. Amartyabag TALK2ME 08:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Notable Teams in "Spongee"

Hi there

Tumbleweed 99 here

I would like to know why you keep deleting my sectiion on notable teams : Tumbleweeds

What kind of source are you looking for?

There is a Winnipeg Free Press article about the Tumbleweeds

in the January 11, 2014 paper This was listed in the references the last time I undid your undo.

I was a source for information in the article. So were several other Tumbleweeds.

I am the Tumbleweeds Historian. I have played for 35 years and have documented every game the Tumbleweeds have played.

Please advise

Thanks in advance

Tumbleweed 99 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.63.13 (talk) 03:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:00, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

tumbleweeds

Thank you very much for your snotty rude reply.

My initial article was posted 3 years ago.

Why did it take so long for you to remove it?

The "attack" on other teams was removed. Quite vicious wasn`t it?

If you read the entire article carefully you would have noticed a few other things that should be removed.

Actually the entire article needs a re-write. IT is quite inaccurate and the sources listed are out dated

Happy editing.

Tumbleweed 99 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.63.13 (talk) 06:36, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Elevator vandal again

In this edit you said that the elevator edit filter had been disabled, and that it might be a good idea to re-enable it if the vandal returned. Well, as you can see here, the vandal has indeed returned. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:38, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Jim Rosenblum Racing

Hi GoGo Dodo. Would you please move this article into my userspace so I can have a look at it? I think the subject may be notable or at the least worth merging or redirecting to a broaders subject. I would like to see what was there when you deleted it. Thanks. Candleabracadabra (talk) 04:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:45, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Survivor-related concensus

Hi there! I've noticed you're a regular contributor to Survivor articles, so I thought I'd let you know about a proposal I've made over at Talk: Survivor (U.S. TV series). I'd love to have your input about it! Survivorfan1995 (talk) 02:59, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

the jephries

Well Gogo Dodo, you deleted my article within 10 minutes of it being posted, you're fast! Is there some rule that says I can't use Wikipedia to make fun of my friends? If you would have let me get around to siting my sources you would have found that the page was not defamatory but very accurate. If you would allow this page to be online for just one week it would make a lot of people laugh, including the band. Furthermore The Jephries are a real band and I hope to create a legitimate page for them, I hope this does interfere with that. I know that this is an educational site and it needs to be accurate... but what could it hurt allowing my page; an insignificant amount of people will see it and it will bring joy to those that do. I hope you respond to me, whatever your answer, as fast as you deleted my Jephries page.

yours truly, MJGG — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Jephries (talkcontribs) 06:39, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Co-founder of Kids Media USA

Okay, well, just to let you know, I'm the co-founder of Kids Media USA (http://kidsmediausa.com/). My classmate (Krisjanis) created FastestLaps (the website, not the Wikipedia article). Altimgamr (talk) 08:03, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Help

I have posted my company profile not for advertisement purpose.so i wrote in short form which includes establishment and services by PIE.I am the Chairman and MD of PIE Inc.My company is located in Nepal.It is a software company.So please kindly assist me to upload my company information.Rest assured I would not violate any rules regarding article.If you find any such please kindly let me know and help display my company profile.

Thank You.


Bimal K.C.

Chairman & MD PIE Inc. Kathmandu,Nepal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bimalkc9 (talkcontribs) 09:29, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:33, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Abusing multiple accounts

Who's IPhone 6 and Chairman Mao? Bishonen | talk 20:19, 26 January 2014 (UTC).

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:22, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

The elevator vandal - the continuing saga

For some reason, I never got a notification of your ping at Wikipedia:Edit filter/Requested. Did you by any chance manually edit the time stamp of your previous post, rather than using ~~~~? That's the one thing I can think of that would have had that effect, since adding a user link is notified only if it is followed by ~~~~. As it happens, it didn't matter, because I saw your edit to User:JamesBWatson/The elevator vandal, and that prompted me to find your other, related, edit. I wonder whether setting the edit filter to block edits is in fact a mistake. Before, the vandal edited only one type of target page, so it was relatively easy to spot. If, however, he/she moves to a wider range of types of pages to evade the edit filter, it will become more difficult to find the edits. I wonder if just setting the edit filter to record the events, but not block them, nor even notify the editor, would be better. That way, we could see the edits and revert them, but the editor might be more likely to keep the vandalism restricted to a limited range of pages. For the same reason, creation-protection of the pages affected may be a mistake. User:John of Reading may also like to comment. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:47, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

This is a good point. Occasional nonsense on portal talk pages isn't going to hurt the project much, as only the vandal and his friends is going to see it. -- John of Reading (talk) 20:58, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
I think we're okay for now as the filter is only looking for edits from that ISP he always uses. If an editor comes from anywhere else, they should be fine. The check against the ISP is part of what makes the filter efficient and unlikely to block any false positives. I've been checking the filter logs every day and it has not blocked anything but him. If he starts using another ISP or goes outside of the two namespaces he is using, then we're going to have a potential problem and changing to a log-only mode might be a good idea.
I had protected his repeat portal talk targets from creation hoping to discourage him, but it appears that I have inadvertently moved him into a different name space. I recall that there are other portal talk pages that have similar protection set by other admins, so I was discouraged to see that he moved to portal when he did not before.
As for the ping not working. I'm not sure what happened there. I did overwrite my original comment, so perhaps that is what caused the notifications to not work. I haven't looked into the details on what does and what does not cause an notification. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Deeeleeete Award

 
Slakr's Deeeleeete Award

For your tireless work in dealing with criteria for speedy deletion, I hereby award you your very own Cyberman to assist with whatever needs deleting should you ever need a break. It's perfectly safe(*), but if it ever starts giving you any lip, just pretend you're dealing with trolls by showing no emotion and give your local doctor a call. :P

Keep up the great work. =) Cheers, --slakrtalk / 05:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you!

  I sensed something was wrong in the Pussy Riot article but tried to be fair to the sockpuppet (not being familiar with Wiki brah's case and of course not knowing it was a sockpuppet). The drink's on me. Cheers! — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 22:08, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:40, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Why you remove my suggested dating site?

I believe this is a mistake, i'm not for advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeme356 (talkcontribs) 08:17, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:23, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Pay what you feel/want

Hello there, I added details of a graphic design company I have come across while in Melbourne - 3 Halves Design http://3halvesdesign.com/ - You deleted it. I thought it deserved mention as many other commercial ventures are mentioned on the page. I believe 3 Halves is a unique pay as you feel/want business. Perhaps I did not pop it in the correct area or I worded it in a way that was incorrect? It should be in the 'History and commercial uses' area? There is mention of albums, restaurants, software, theatres, bakeries, video games and may more on the page - why not design? Apologies but English is not my 1st language and this is my 1st time using wiki pages. Please do let me know your thoughts and concerns and reasons. With many thanks, Orla — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orla.oregan (talkcontribs) 09:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:10, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Message

  Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:36, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

He's back (Alpha Kappa Rho related)

Special:Contributions/Yug0n87,60o he created Akrho looking like the others... Now I happen to think that Akrho makes sense as a redirect to Alpha Kappa Rho, but to duplicate it. Sheesh.Naraht (talk) 14:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

All those results

Thanks for taking action. I should have done that. One more maybe:

Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:05, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

And:

Take a look at the deleted User:Ecowater1. It has the "present on". Maybe that's just a popular phrase now. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:44, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Multiple Accounts

Thanks for blocking all those spam accounts that were merely created to endorse Third Party site on Wikipedia. Since the content was copied from my user page I got a bit tensed that even my account may get blocked as it might have created confusion that all this is done by me. But I'm glad that you blocked the actual spammers. Thank you.
Regards,
--Wiki.Gunjan (talk) 06:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:36, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Lord Laitinen

I know why you think you rightfully deleted my article, but you are wrong. As I said in my edits, my article and my user name are based on someone I once met, not myself or a close friend or family member. It is not a blatant hoax, because, to my knowledge, all of the information is accurate and truthful, no matter how unbelievable it seems. I find it insulting to have my first page deleted minutes after I wrote it, and I consider leaving Wikipedia because of your rudeness. Do not delete my page again!Lord Laitinen (talk) 07:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Gogo Dodo, Is it not time to stop all this nonsense from "user" Lord Laitinen? Best regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 11:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Many thanks and regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 21:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

I will not return those links, but I find it very odd that you are the only one deleting all my pages and edits. If they were breaking rules, why does no one else delete them before you? Surely, there must be other administrators on this huge website. I suppose my next note will make you, David J. Johnson, and FreeRangeFrog quite happy. I AM LEAVING WIKIPEDIA BECAUSE OF YOU IDIOTS HARASSING ME CONSTANTLY! As an administrator, you have the power to remove users, and I am asking you to remove me immediately. I am shocked at the disrespect and condescension I have been subjected to, and I want to leave ASAP! My user page has already been deleted. I hope you treat other new users better than you treated me. Go with God, who will surely curse you for the huge amount of disrespect towards a Catholic. I better make sure I forget not to sign, or maybe I will be harassed by somebody else again!Lord Laitinen (talk) 19:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Possible sock puppet?

User:Ljupce7654 and User:Ljupce765 Both started a similar previously deleted article. Wgolf (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Re: Sockpuppet I found

And another one: User:Deejay Pinch Kenya and User:Deejayflame — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wgolf (talkcontribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Aei4eia

I noticed your blocking of Aei4eia for ISU and as the Account creator that created this account, I was hoping you could give me some insight as to how this username represented a group, organization, or website so that I can improve my filtering techniques for future accounts. Thank you kindly, — {{U|Technical 13}} (tec) 21:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

I blocked the account because the user page the created was linked to the management consulting firm at http://www.aei4eia.com.au/. It also contained typical marketing buzzwords and phrases, though they were removed after the {{db-spam}} tag was placed on the user page (by a steward, though I just noticed that and it wasn't a factor in my deletion and block). It was obvious from the web link and the material added that they were there to promote or act on behalf of the company.
I don't know what the account request looked like, but the account name by itself wouldn't have raised any flags for me. It looks pretty innocuous being fairly random looking. It was only after their edits that the company question was obvious. The company website does appear first if you Google the name, but I don't think you want to be Googling every name requested. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Goggling requested names is actually a fairly common practice, although I'm guessing I didn't for this particular name because I wasn't expecting there to be any possibility of Aei4eia being a notable name or word. Had I seen that, I likely would have created the account anyway as that kind of name would fall under AGF. I likely would have used the {{Welcome-COI|newuser=yes}} welcome message though. Thanks for your reply, I'll keep a better eye out for these types of names in the future. Happy wikiing! — {{U|Technical 13}} (tec) 04:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

clear deleted logs

hei, please clear deleted logs, so not show on google search. if i type iwindcorporation is show the deletion logs from here. please clear from google or guide me how to clear it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.72.95.144 (talk) 12:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I can not remove deletion logs. While some logs may be suppressed under certain circumstances, I do not believe this is one of those cases, though you are welcome to make a request. Removal of logs because it appears in Google is not a valid reason for suppression except under specific circumstances. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I don't see Wikipedia results for that. Google has the bad habit of showing oft-visited pages in search results despite the fact that they are not in their index, so that might be the case here. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
I Googled it, too, and I don't get the deletion log results either. The first site returned is their corporate website followed by their Facebook page. Restricting the Google search to just en.wikipedia.org doesn't find it either. All you get is the Twinkle CSD log for the editor who tagged it. The log will never show up in Google results because both the deletion log and the redlinked article all have <meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow" /> in it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Filipino Syndicate

I noticed Filipino Syndicate was deleted by you today as a G5, but I can't see deleted contribs so I'm not sure if Organisasyon is the same thing - creator is Nitesmavin689. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
And another one. G5 speedy removed, then removed again by a new account. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I hadn't been feeling well for the past few days (bird flu and all, you know). I think I cleaned up the mess and blocked all of the sockpuppets I could find. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
No worries, hope you're feeling better! §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
I'm fine. Took some bird medication. All back to my zany self. Anyways, I added Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Malusia22 to my watchlist, so I'll notice a few more accounts now. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
I just realized I should have been a bit less lazy and added those accounts and IP to the SPI page, sorry. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
No worries. If you report them to me directly or at the SPI, I'll deal with them. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:25, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JonoDunn

Re: User talk:Anna Frodesiak#I was identified as something called a sock puppet?

Should I simply ask what's going on and where this userpage template comes from? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Sure, if you want to. Though as I commented in the SPI, I'm inclined to let these go and instead chase after the blatant spammers. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
I might. I'm not sure if it would do more harm than good. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:57, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
You might want to answer KrystianSzastok about their specific questions, but I think I would leave out trying to figure out where the template came from or if they are taking some SEO course. Even if you find out where it came from, there really isn't anything that can be done about it. They haven't doing any blatant spamming, so I'm inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Fair enough. Cheers, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:21, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhay Gupta Varanasi

User:Editor Abhay

Same guy? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

I saw that account last year. I'm sure that isn't him. At first glance you would think it was him, but he doesn't have the same topical focus or editing habits. Just a coincidental name. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Okay. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:57, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
He will be back and I'll find him yet again. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Maybe an AN/I proposal to send Jimbo-henchmen to his door to bust his keyboard in half? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
I sent you an email about him. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Help needed to fix a few more Survivor links

Hey thanks again for helping to fix all those links back in December! Recently a few other articles on Survivor contestants have been resurrected and had either broken or missing links to their CBS bios in the "External links" section. They are Earl Cole, Todd Herzog, Sandra Diaz-Twine, Tyson Apostol, and Susan Hawk. Could u help me fix those too? I'm still having a hard time finding some of them. Thanks! Survivorfan1995 (talk) 04:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your help! As for the other ones, I knew they had no links to them, that's what I was trying to fix (I assume they got removed or were never there in the first place). But I think since you've showed me what to do, I can take care of those others. Thanks again! Survivorfan1995 (talk) 05:32, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Reverting back to old data for OnMobile wiki

I had updated information on OnMobile wiki. Why did you change it to the old version? It states products that no longer exist. Kindly refer to their website and take appropriate call.Komalgupta2003 (talk) 05:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)komal

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I am removing old product lines and replacing it with new products. Doing this, as the current information is leading. I am also removing the line about Arvind Rao as it is a very old issue, negative one and does not hold relevance in the current scenario. Hope you will respect my editing. Komalgupta2003 (talk) 06:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)komal

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Sindikato guy

Do you think that https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pentagon_%28organized_crime_group%29&diff=597130517&oldid=597022940 is the same guy?Naraht (talk) 02:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Note also https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_gangs_in_the_Philippines&diff=597130888&oldid=597023283 by the same IP.Naraht (talk) 02:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:52, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Just for future reference

Thanks for reverting that edit on my talk page, but I actually wanted to keep it there, so I put it back. I had a box at the top of the page asking people not to and explaining why, but I don't blame you if you didn't notice it. Just letting you know for future reference. flarn2006 [u t c] time: 03:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:55, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Request for sock puppet data

I am a Computer Science Ph.D.student. Is there any source of all the vandal user/IPs and sock puppets? Thanks Srijankedia (talk) 23:36, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:30, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Northwind band deleted

This is what you state in the 'common reasons why you have deleted my article' :

If you or your band is unsigned or has yet to release any albums through a major label or important indie label, then you are not likely to meet the notability criteria.

Don't you think that Polydor and EMI are important labels? I think you do, and I think it is fair that you should bring the article up again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.38.145.131 (talk) 11:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

I suspect that this is a case of two bands having the same name, one that might be notable and one that was clearly not notable back in 2011 when the article was deleted. I checked the website for Polydor records and there is no Northwind group listed, so I can not verify if it is the same band as the one deleted in 2011. The band whose article I deleted back in 2011 was clearly not notable at the time because it was newly formed and had released no records. It appears to be some teenagers' brand new band. The name Northwind (band) is not a particularly unique name, so having two bands with the same name is entirely plausible. Going back to the band you are referring to, you are welcome to create an account and write a new article about the band, but there is no reason for me to undelete the article from 2011 as it was clearly non-notable at the time of deletion and there is nothing salvageable from the deleted article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:26, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

RevDel request

Hi there, these revisions contain copyrighted material accidently added by an author. They have contacted OTRS (Ticket:2014022710015261) requesting that it is removed. Can you please press the relevant buttons? Thanks, --Mdann52talk to me! 08:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

@Mdann52: I'm a bit leery about revdel'ing the edits in question because I don't have OTRS access so I can't verify what the ticket says. Not that I don't trust you, I do, but for my own sake, I really prefer to know the entire situation when I use my buttons. I would prefer you ask an admin with OTRS access to make the revdel. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

You may have a valid point

Dear Gogo Dodo,

As immature as changing the words "sun" to "bun", McMorris never actually graduated and we have a valid siting as he publicly admitted it on his personal documentary. Please revert that appropriate section of my edit.

Much love,

Wiki User Raptor_Taco — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raptor taco (talkcontribs) 07:18, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:35, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Phillipine syndicate

Another sockpuppet and salting candidate for you at Phillipine syndicate. Thanks, Ruby Murray 17:18, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:52, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
And another: Totoy golem. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:29, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I cleaned up the small mess. I noticed that they are spreading to other language wikis. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:30, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Damn, hopefully they'll get bored soon. It's amazing what people with too much time on their hands can do with a computer and an internet connection. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Chicken George

Hello there, Ben Vereen is actually known amongst the public as Chicken George, as he played this part in Roots. If I provide a reference/source stating this, surely I can add this nickname? --Sålken Trøst (talk) 21:07, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:14, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
But most people just call him Chicken George. I saw him at Ontario airport last year and everyone was like Oh my god it is Chicken George!. No one called him by his real name. So I think he should be called Ben Vereen alongside Chicken George. Can I do this or should I propose this on it's talk page? --Sålken Trøst (talk) 21:21, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:56, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Following our heated debate over Chicken George, I have decided to 1. Bring it up on the talk page and 2. Ask for Jimbo Wales opinion. --Sålken Trøst (talk) 20:19, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
It still has not been brought up on the talk page and I don't suggest it be.--Mark Miller (talk) 23:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Lord Laitinen

Why must you keep bothering me? I have not said anything to you, or done anything "problematic". I made the user page for me, and I highly doubt that it is being read by thousands of people who would question its integrity; to be frank, it is not hurting anybody. I even awarded you a Barnstar for your loyalty to Wikipedia, and yet you still disrespect me at your peril! Also, to address an earlier argument, I never said I was being discriminated because I was Catholic; I was surprised that an American would have such disrespect and disregard for a Catholic, that's all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord Laitinen (talkcontribs) 07:12, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
  • On Facebook, I cannot edit; I enjoy editing on this website and plan on continuing to do so for some time. I have limited the amount of biographical information, and added information related to Wikipedia. My page was deleted by RHaworth earlier, for the reason of "freeloading". After contributing 100 times, I was allowed to return my page to the Wikipedia, because I am a contributor. I hope we can get along better in the future, but the first step to that is leaving my user page alone. As I said earlier, it is not hurting anybody. I will also try to follow Wikipedia's guidelines better, regarding references, editing, and the creation of pages. If you wish to reply, do so on my talk page.Lord Laitinen (talk) 04:21, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you for blocking those harassers. I know that at least one of them was a family member just joking around, but I still plan to scold them for doing that. I have already asked RHaworth for semi-protection on the page, since it has been vandalized four times in one day.Lord Laitinen (talk) 03:56, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
You're welcome. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:04, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

DivergentTris

Can you reblock User:DivergentTris without talk page access? Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Done. I saw several of those accounts while RC patrolling and I knew there were tag team editing. I was contemplating blocking them earlier, but hesitated until I saw them edit the SPI. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Heads Up

You have a block evading sock at User:BillyHatcher2012. Flat Out let's discuss it 04:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

I was wondering if he would come back. I blocked the account. Thanks for the heads up! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:24, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Haiwei Dong

Both you and @Bbb23: have deleted this page only for it to be recreated again .... can you review it again and if (as i think it does) still meet the A7/G11 then can you delete it and WP:SALT it (since this is the 3 creation). (x-posted to Bbb23). LGA talkedits 06:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:44, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Brandiperkins

You have indefblocked this new user for adding spam links; he added the sae link twice, it appears. He has posted what I think is a sincere apology; I am minded to shorten his block to a few days, while at the same time instructing him to spend the time learning about the project. What do you think? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:54, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Help at Survivor: Cagayan

Hello, I am having a dispute with a User:Gloss over a well-precedented edit I made. To avoid approaching 3RR, I have refrained from reverting, but I need help. See [2] and [3]. Jeff announced the tribes are being dissolved (I don't know if you saw the preview, he said drop buffs and B,B,B are no more). I preemptively made the swapped tribe column as well always do, but this person is falsely reverting me. Please help. I am taking this to the talk page. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 01:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

The whole discussion is here Thegreyanomaly (talk) 02:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

[4] This is the preview in question. It just hit the net. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 04:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:29, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Totally understand. Remember, the burden is on the community to make the summaries, not you. I would do them if I had more time, but then again I don't read them often. You devote enough time to Wikipedia as it is, let the burden go to someone else. Anyways, I found an explicit source from Jeff [5]. Since we don't know who goes where, I have refrained from re-adding the column though. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 17:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:46, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Recreation of FastestLaps

I was about to make talk page, and review. But I've checked that you had deleted this page. You can let me know if article is notable and well sourced. Ping me. OccultZone (Talk) 03:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Do not copy and paste content from external sites

Hi Gogo Dodo,

I'm leaving this on your talk page b/c I saw that you once protected user MER-C. As you can read below, he addressed a concern with me and I wanted to readdress his concern. Unfortunately, he doesn't have a talk page, so I had to leave on his user page. Sorry, I left this here, but I felt it needed to be on someones talk page and you were at some point conected to him or her. Please feel free to remove. spatms (talk) 21:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Message for MER-C

  Your addition to Eastern Penn Geographical Union has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MER-C 03:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Dear MER-C,

I'm not sure why as a user on wikipedia you do not have a talk page, so I'm forced to address my concern here (AND LEFT IT ON YOUR USER PAGE). I wish to inform you that I DID NOT take copyrighted material and add to wikipedia. The Eastern Penn Geographical Union page was a redirect from the Eastern Pennsylvania Rugby Union page that had already been created. You can see that from the bot warning I left on my talk page on purpose, so you can see the steps I took in redirecting. Therefore, the person who created the Eastern Pennsylvania Rugby Union page is the person that used copyrighted material. I wouldn't know that it was copyrighted, nor was that my concern. My concern was redirecting to the newly created Eastern Penn Geographical Union page due to changes by USA Rugby. I would like to add that the Eastern Pennsylvania Rugby Union page lacked references, but I added references on the Eastern Penn Geographical Union page after the redirect. Whatever penalties are now associated with my user name need to be removed. I appreciate your help with keeping wikipedia clear of copyrighted material, but you were wrong in this instance. Please don't take this as confrontational. I'm merely explaining what occurred on the page. I will also leave this reply on my talk page, so it shows I properly addressed the situation. spatms (talk) 21:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:36, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

ACDM DC Regional Chapter Page Deleted

I was in the middle of creating the page for the association which is why I was not finished before you deleted it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aallex87 (talkcontribs) 16:43, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Alex Preston (singer) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How do I document permission from Alex Preston that its ok to put it up from his site.. No where in your message does it say how to do it.. If you can tell me how to or point me to a link that tell's me how to.. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rob Rocco781 (talkcontribs) 18:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:39, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

User talk:YasminPerry

You must know something I don't because I didn't see any vandalism from this person, much less anything worthy of "your only warning".— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:43, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

The edits that prompted the warning were to a now deleted talk page, Talk:Lynne Triplett, which is why you do not see the edits in her contributions. That talk page is related to a protected article that has repeatedly been the target of personal attacks by trolls. The talk page has also been used by the trolls and I locked it, too. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:03, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Okay, I understand.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 16:58, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

www.WeRecoverData.com

Hi. I created the article. The president of that company hired me to put their name on Wikipedia. I thought it is no issue since I'm only referring to only one company. Unless maybe the content I used here was taken from a totally different company. Deeissoulless (talk) 05:35, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:44, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Message from Alistairwm

hi Gogo Dodo there has been a misunderstanding About Slavia News — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alistairwm (talkcontribs) 05:41, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

SPI

Hi Gogo, thanks for helping out at SPI! Please feel free to mark the case as closed when you block and tag the socks (especially for cases where a CU has been done). Thanks, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:57, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Sure, I can do that from now on. I wasn't sure if closing was a clerk-only thing, but I read the documentation and I now see where the line is. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:01, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
It's only archiving (plus endorsing for CU, etc) that's a clerk only thing :) Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Right. =) I just didn't want to overstep my bounds and all. You're the one with the nifty hat, not me. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Regarding your message about external link submission.

I am adding this Link (Redacted) to Wikipedia to give an extra information about this word. And one more thing, I am not associated with them as you mentioned in your message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rituvermapk1 (talkcontribs) 22:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:17, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

BenBen

Hi Godo Dogo, you probably do not want to get involved in the fight over TJ Young with BenBen. He is being unreasonable and it is getting nasty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KCoppy (talkcontribs) 02:53, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:04, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Gojo Dopo, I am calling your bluff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KCoppy (talkcontribs)
Hello Gogo Dodo, thanks for your help with this hotheated student. --Ben Ben (talk) 03:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Andrewbf

He is always changed genre that unsourced, it's so annoying. If he change unsourced genre again, you must block him with expiry set of indefinite. 180.73.230.72 (talk) 11:57, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

I recommend that should he continue to make such genre changes that you bring up the issue on WP:ANI. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Psst

This wasn't a hoax, it was meant as a user page. The editor appears to be a primary-school kid. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:45, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Question - ANI or Sock?

I noticed some suspicious user account creation activity. A bunch of accounts starting with "16". Should that go on ANI or start a sockpuppet investigation? No edits yet, but they are all created within a short time span. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:06, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

PS - asking you as I see you're active at the moment and I've talked with you in the past :) EvergreenFir (talk) 05:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:16, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the reply. Just had me concerned. I'll let them go for now and save the sock report on my sandbox in case I need it. Cheers! EvergreenFir (talk) 05:16, 28 March 2014 (UTC)