Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please be sure not to try to edit war your desired changes in on the Coronavirus disease article. That won't be a productive way to get your message across. If you continue, you will likely end up being blocked and the material won't stick. Instead, I suggest starting a discussion with other editors on the article's talk page. You can try to make your case there for why the material should be included and see if you can gain consensus to include it in the article. Please remember, the onus is on you, when you try to add new material to an article, to justify its inclusion. TylerDurden8823 (talk) 04:54, 27 March 2020 (UTC)