User talk:Curps/archive18

oonml29

hey! Unban me! My IP address is shared by many Singnet users and it isn't fair for you to ban me for what some irresponsible vandal did to wikipedia!

You didn't mention what IP address is involved or which user (if it's an autoblock). -- Curps 13:00, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

John Kim08

If you put me off the block list, I will never vandalize again.

You said that before. Anyway, you're unblocked. -- Curps 20:39, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

And obviously he vandalized again and got reblocked. -- Curps 18:39, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

John Kim08

I pledge to stop vandalizing and devote my cause to making Wikipedia better.

69.235.202.57

I will promise to stop vandalizing.

69.235.202.57

Curps, I pledge to stop vandalizing.

Cleanup

- Thanks for your cleanup efforts with that new WoW account :-) --HappyCamper 15:44, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Block showing user number

WHy do some IP blocks show a user number instead of a name? Rich Farmbrough 23:44, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Stars

Well, I consider it worthwhile. We're talking about their notability at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/56 Aquilae. --Merovingian (t) (c) (e) 03:04, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Precious

By the authority vested in me as, uhm, some random guy on the web, I hereby award you the WikiMedal for Janitorial Services for keeping the vandal bots at bay. MarkSweep✍ 07:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Unblock

Just to note that I've unblocked an autoblock for a user sharing an IP address with User:Kat Fletchers smug face; they e-mailed me and have edited in the past without any problems, their explanation is that a housemate was vandalising Wikipedia and they have now stopped them using their machine. Warofdreams talk 17:12, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Rogue Admin

CURPS - YOU ARE A ROUGE ADMIN AND SHOULD BE DESYSOPPED! PS - Keep up the good work →Raul654 09:50, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

It Looks Like You Beat Me To The Punch

I was going to block User:Bonefuck until 1 Jan 2754, but I guess "infinite" works just as well ;-) Karmafist 05:15, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

I am in love

...well no, but this blocking of vandalism is amazing.

Molotov (talk)
04:20, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

I have to second that comment about blocking of vandalism. I was going to check out this member who's username was only numbers, and when I saw the contribs, and history, and that you had reverted his/her vandalism so quickly, I was surprised. Bravo!--ViolinGirl^♪ 23:52, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Who are you?

Who are you and why did you put this edit on my personal, private scratch page? Rex071404 ^{216.153.214.94} 07:33, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

• laffo, I can't wait to see you add User:Curpsbot-unicodify to your list of Liberal Cabalers--anon editor 00:29, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Wacky username vandalism

Hey, is there anyway to simply block the IP or IP ranges responsible for those usernames? --Madchester 17:55, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Yes, but we can't tell you about it. (insert Defender of the Wiki barnstar here) for blocking all those supertroll accounts. Alphax ^τεχ 18:43, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Unblock Me

Curps, can you please unblock me(User:Superm401 with IP User:68.80.134.151. See explanation at User talk:Superm401 and Wikipedia:Village pump (technical#Usernames with "$ + digit":. I posted at User talk:Superm401 using my own user name, so you can verify that this request is genuine. I was investigating your $-digit display bug, and you or your bot blocked me. :) 152.163.101.11 20:09, 22 October 2005 (UTC)(User:Superm401)

Sorry

Gah! I can't believe I did that. I'm sorry. :( -- My apologies.

When I pulled up the page history, I had two browsers open, one on your page, and one on Kurps. I guess I got confused and mistook it for a pagemove. It was only after I deleted the page and tried to move it back that I realized it wasn't the case. --HappyCamper 21:26, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Protecting Schnorrer

Good timing, that! I have to leave soon for work... Cheers, --Fire Star 22:17, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Please stop

so far, for most of the edits that i have made today, you have delete and gave some lame exuse. Instead of just delteing everything that i make, how about you edit it instead and make some corrections. You are deafeating the whole purpose of wikipedia if nobody can edit it. -- unsigned message by Jakewater (talk · contribs)

Well, you added your own birthday to July 21. You created 2990s for a stub article with zero content about a decade that won't happen for 1000 years... that article has now been deleted 13 times (although many of the previous creations months ago presumably weren't you). I also deleted Sam foran which you created at 21:20, 24 October 2005... its entire contents were 'Sam Foran is a poopie pie poop cake dukiesh yakish poop head cake cake yummy poop'. -- Curps 02:33, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Please stop #2

Ok, first of all, that was my couisin's birthday, and he is actualy a very popular violinist. The Sam Foran article i did not create, that was probably my little brother, i will make sure that doesnt happen agian. The article i made about the Scopes trial, instead of totaly deleting what i wrote, you could have just edited for me and fixed the mistakes. What i am about to say is not to critize you, i am going to say this to help you in becoming a beter wikipedia user: Think about what you are doing before you do it, and also, instead of deleting everything, think of an alternitive.

You didn't write the article about the Scopes Trial, you simply added a single phrase. The phrase stated that the jury decided to charge Darrow with contempt, which I reverted with an explanation for the reason (I don't believe it's up to a jury to file charges of contempt of court, so I don't believe that was accurate or correct) [1]. "Totally deleting" a single phrase (with explanation) is a normal part of the editing process. -- Curps 01:43, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism Bovinae

On the page Bovinae there is a vandalism I guess, have a look there, -jkb- 08:28, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

block

User:Bluemoose would like you to unblock him, see [2]. Sam Spade 18:47, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

The underlying IP is now unblocked. I didn't block him per se, I blocked the newly created User:Bluebot, because it doesn't seem to have been discussed at Wikipedia:Bots or its talk page, because we had the sock User:Blue Moon Cocktail Bar earlier today, and because of the trouble we had with spoof vandalbots like User:Uncle Ed's major work 'bot. He unblocked User:Bluebot himself, perhaps he could have gone ahead and unblocked the underlying IP as well. -- Curps 18:57, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, I know you didnt mean to block me, I tried to unblock the IP but I couldn't find any record of it being blocked, also it might be a good idea to enable an email so people can contact you if you block them by accident. p.s. I know the bot hadn't been discussed, but it also hadn't been used. thanks Martin 19:05, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

When you go to Special:Ipblocklist, you may need to scroll past the default 100 entries, eg: view 500 entries, by clicking in the "View (previous 100) (next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)." line. As for blocking an account before it's used, well, that's occasionally done intentionally, given the vandal silliness recently. For instance, two recent spoof Uncle G bots: User:Uncle G's NEW Major Work Bot and User:Uncle G's 2nd Major Work Bot. -- Curps 19:21, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

It's cool, you don't need to explain yourself. Good job on all those other blocks! thanks Martin 22:20, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Unblock

I'm unblocking 64.36.3.34 (your infinite block of November 1) following a request Jimbo forwarded to the wikien-l mailing list. Charles Matthews 15:13, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Impostor

Curps, when blocking a new incarnation of the Doppelganger vandal, please do not put "spoof of So-and-so" in the summary, and do not delete the user and talk pages. Place the {{impostor}} templates in both the user and talk pages, and please don't write "cloned spoof page" in the edit summary. Thanks. Don Diego^(Talk) 19:55, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

OK, I'll use the impostor templates and the phrasing "impostor" instead of "spoof". -- Curps 22:39, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Suggestion for your bot

Just noticed one thing that could possibly be refined in your bot. See this [3] edit. It changed [[Brandenburg_%28disambiguation%29|Brandenburg (disambiguation)]] into [[Brandenburg (disambiguation)|Brandenburg (disambiguation)]]. Would have made more sense if it just changed it to [[Brandenburg (disambiguation)]]. chowells 18:14, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Actually, it was already changed to do that. That was one of the earlier edits. -- Curps 18:29, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Block of WorldTraveller

I use wikipedia both at home and at school, and my home IP has been banned. I'm writing this while on the school computers. Apparently you have blocked someone named "Worldtraveller" and because of this my home IP has been blocked. I don't know why this is, but please fix this. --Hurricane Angel 19:43, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

01 ! Reverts

Hi Curps, thanks for reverting those pages that 01 ! moved today. It was funny, the moment I noticed he was vandalizing pages, I added a note to his page. Apparently I wasn't the only one -- two other people also warned him at the same time! Anways... you saved me some trouble fixing some pages :). --mdd4696 23:15, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Block of Francs2000

Hi, just to let you know that the doppelganger was created by me, to prevent someone else from doing it. I just had to unblock my own IP. -- Francs2000 11:12, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Block

Mostly just to be safe. I've seen some strange reports of IP's that got double blocked actually being able to edit, so -- one block is enough, I noticed that you'd already blocked so I figured I'd just lift it to be on the safe side. · Katefan0^(scribble) 19:26, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

BTW, since those are all anagrams of your name, have you considered just preemptively blocking any other strange anagrams of your name? (Oh, I also blocked Skrof.) Must say your block script is impressive. · Katefan0^(scribble) 19:27, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Ah, well that quite changes things doesn't it! I hadn't realized that. The pertinent bit here being as long as the two blocks are of equal length. Learn something new every day. Thanks. I'll re-block if you haven't already. · Katefan0^(scribble) 19:33, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

I agree, particularly since the MO seems to be to make one edit, then switch accounts and make another edit. · Katefan0^(scribble) 19:36, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

You've got some "admirers"

Hey Curps, there are some dopplegangers no doubt itching to make trouble for you, they popped up at around 19:36, 29 October 2005. Just thought i'd let you know, I blocked three. Karmafist 21:25, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

New users

If you're around you had better check the new user log. Time to get the block bot running again I think. the wub "?!" 22:03, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

article moves

Thank you for adding User:Reader72s crap to Wikipedia again. -- Mkill 22:57, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

I merely reverted your improper page moves. Articles that need to be improved should be edited in place, not "kidnapped" into your user space, especially since there are many other editors who have edited these articles. -- Curps 23:07, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Ok, I put them on AfD. There are too many nice people on Wikipedia with a too high crap tolerance. Now their time is wasted further. By the way, the articles are not bad quality translations from Japanese, the author is a native Spanish speaker. At least research into the history of some bad articles before posing as Wikipedia police. -- Mkill 23:20, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Edit articles in place or nominate for AfD. Thanks for your cooperation. -- Curps 00:41, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Thank You

Curps, Thank you for your help with the article I began (Klooga concentration camp). I hadn't been able redirect the page from the typo "Klooga concentraion camp". I greatly appreciate your promptness and helpfulness! ExRat 06:25, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Vandalbots and such

Hey Curps! I blocked a handfull of possible vandalbots just today, and I was wondering if they would have been caught by the algorithm that you are using for blocking them? If you get a chance, could you take a look at my block log? Here's my block log for your convenience: [4]. Thanks for your help! --HappyCamper 14:57, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

You might want to fix the superfluous & in the Goleta Slough article

You might want to check the article carefully for the superfluous ampersand, which was reintroduced when you fixed the problem I caused by my attempt to conform to the ISO 8859-1 Character standard.—GraemeMcRae^talk 22:49, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Much better. Thanks.—GraemeMcRae^talk 23:01, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

POPBot

You may want to check out the history of Mammal. A vandal using open proxies, including ones that were previously indef blocked according to the evidence from the POPBot, has been using these IPs. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-10-31 20:59

Noob123, Torchris

Well, the first one screams vandal, the 2nd one started with Tor, so maybe I went too far with that one. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-11-1 08:23

Doppelganger accounts

I was trying to follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Doppelganger to keep imposters from registering variations of my username, but after about the seventh account that I registered, either you or your bot apparently blocked the accounts permanently and blocked my IP address for 24 hours. (I'm using a different computer now.) Anyhow, I suppose it's OK that the doppelgangers are blocked, but there are several (at least 136) more variations of my username that vandals could potentially use to impersonate me. Do I need to register those as doppelgangers too? And, if so, how can I do it without having my IP blocked? --TantalumTelluride 18:34, 2 November 2005 (UTC)