User talk:Bill william compton/Archive 15

Archive 10

←

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

→

Archive 20

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

• Special report: Wikimedia and the "seismic shift" towards open-access research publication

• News and notes: Finance debate drags on as editor survey finds Wikipedia too bureaucratic

• WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse

• Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week

• Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure

• Technology report: Cross-wiki watchlist controversy; and is "go file a bug" really a useful response?

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 22:18, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

The Tea Leaf - Issue Three

Hi! Welcome to the third edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!

• Teahouse reaches two month mark. The Teahouse has been live on English Wikipedia for two months now and evidence of the project's impact is beginning to show. Thank you to the hosts and Wikipedians who have helped make the Teahouse the valuable place for new editor's to seek help and feel welcome.
• April metrics report has been posted on meta! Some relevant metrics from April’s report include:

• In April, Teahouse averaged 45 questions per week.
• An average of 20 new editors visiting for the first time were served at the Teahouse, in addition to repeat guests.

Wikipedia Teahouse always keeps it classy!

• Many guests are repeat visitors: the average guest asks 1.5 questions and 22% of guests ask more than one question.

• Reports show that the Teahouse is having a positive impact on editor engagement! Comparing a sample of 75 new editors who participate in the Teahouse with a control group (of equivalent size and similar first-day editing activity) shows:

• New editors who participate in the Teahouse edit 10x the number of articles than the uninvited control group.
• New editor participants also make an average six times more global edits.
• Average Teahouse participants add 26 times more bytes of content that survive on Wikipedia (meaning content that isn't reverted or deleted) than the uninvited control group.

• More Teahouse participants remain active on Wikipedia at least 10 days later. Among the 224 editors in our three experimental groups, 28 percent of new editors who participate in the Teahouse were still active on Wikipedia at least ten days later, compared with 12 percent who received an invitation but didn't actively participate in the Teahouse, and only 5 percent from a similar uninvited control group.
• Teahouse visibility is a challenge, as we try to make the Teahouse visible to new editors, invitation has been the the main way of informing new editors about the Teahouse, and while that is a powerful tool, many new editors go uninvited. Input on Teahouse link placement is welcome! (Join in on the conversation here.)
• Want to know how you can lend a hand at the Teahouse? Become a host! Learn more about what makes the Teahouse different than other help spaces on Wikipedia and see how you can help new editors by visiting here.
• Say hello to the new guests at the Teahouse. Take the time to welcome and get to know the latest guests at the Teahouse. Drop off some wikilove to these editors today, as being welcomed by experienced editors is a really nice way to make new editors feel welcome.

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. Sarah (talk) 15:34, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:USIT official logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:USIT official logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:46, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey

Teahouse logo

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback!

We have created a brief survey intended to help us understand the experiences and impressions of veteran editors who have participated on the Teahouse. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages some time during the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 15 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 01:10, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

• From the editor: New editor-in-chief

• News and notes: Two new Wikimedia fellows to boost strategies for tackling major issues

• WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....

• Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week

• Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending

• Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 02:19, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012 Wikification Drive

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 15:03, 26 May 2012 (UTC).

Self-identification for caste

Hi, Just now you posted your comment here:Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Photo_montages_in_infoboxes_of_caste.2Fcommunity_articles. But I'm doubtful why we are stressing for self-identification in the case of caste. Are we equating caste to a religion? --AshLey ^Msg 15:51, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

The reason is clear, many people don't want to associate with any caste. — Bill william compton^Talk 02:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Houla Masscare

Hello Bill william compton. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Houla Masscare, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 19:16, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

• News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends

• Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph

• WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology

• Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese

• Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits

• Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 07:40, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Host feedback needed at the Teahouse!

Hi! We're seeking your feedback as a current or formal host at the Teahouse about the project. Please stop by and lend your voice at your convenience, here. Thanks :) Sarah (talk) 19:57, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 May newsletter

We're halfway through round 3 (or the quarter finals, if you prefer) and things are running smoothly. We're seeing very high scoring; as of the time of writing, the top 16 all have over 90 points. This has already proved to be more competative than this time last year- in 2011, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 was the lowest qualifying score. People have also upped their game slightly from last round, which is to be expected as we approach the end of the competition. Leading Pool A is Cwmhiraeth (submissions), whose points have mostly come from a large number of did you knows on marine biology. Pool B's leader, Grapple X (submissions), is for the first time not our highest scorer at the time of newsletter publication, but his good articles on The X-Files and Millenium keep him in second place overall. Miyagawa (submissions) leads Pool C, our quietest pool, with content in a variety of areas on a variety of topics. Pool D is led by Casliber (submissions), our current overall leader. Nearly half of Casliber's points come from his triple-scored Western Jackdaw, which is now a featured article.

This round has seen an unusually high number of featured lists, with nearly one in five remaining participants claiming one, and one user, Muboshgu (submissions), claiming two. Miyagawa's featured list, 1936 Summer Olympics medal table, was even awarded double points. By comparison, good article reviews seem to be playing a smaller part, and featured topics portals remain two content-types still unutilised in this competition. Other than that, there isn't much to say! Things are coming along smoothly. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:24, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Tag and Assess 2012

	Thank You
	With the help of contributors like you, the Tag and Assess 2012 project has achieved the planned objectives. Close to 65,000 articles have been assessed and 19,000 articles have been added to the scope of the project. Please do watch out for the post tag and assess activities. Thanks a lot. Ssriram mt (talk) 00:52, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for !voting

	at my successful RFA
	Thank you, Bill william compton, for !voting at my successful RFA; I am humbled that you put your trust in me. I grant you this flower, which, if tended to properly, will grow to be the fruit of Wikipedia's labours. Can't wait to see more about the Asian Games. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Kembali! — Bill william compton^Talk 12:49, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

• Special report: WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women

• News and notes: Editors want most funding for technical areas, while widespread ignorance of WMF board elections and chapters persists; voting still live on Commons best picture

• Discussion report: Watching Wikipedia change

• WikiProject report: Views of WikiProject Visual Arts

• Featured content: On the lochs

• Arbitration report: Two motions for procedural reform, three open cases, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban

• Technology report: Report from the Berlin Hackathon

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 08:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

25 Did you knows

		The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Well usually I have to look and see what people do but it this case I know your work from MonmouthpediA where your skill with Hindi is so valuable. Do remember that there is one for 50 too! Thank you on behalf of the wiki Victuallers (talk) 08:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Roger. — Bill william compton^Talk 12:18, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Kapil Dev

Hi, looks like you're back after a break. Any chance you could take a look into this list. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 04:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, it is a FFLC. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 15:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

The Brett Lee list is also under PR. Please have a look at it whenever you are free. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 15:14, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Bill william compton. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 21:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Sarah (talk) 21:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Afghanistan at the 2002 Asian Games

The article Afghanistan at the 2002 Asian Games you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Afghanistan at the 2002 Asian Games for things which need to be addressed. GoP_T^C_N 08:32, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of India at the 2011 Commonwealth Youth Games

The article India at the 2011 Commonwealth Youth Games you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:India at the 2011 Commonwealth Youth Games for things which need to be addressed. GoP_T^C_N 09:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!

	Teahouse Barnstar
	I, Sarah, hereby award you, Bill, the Teahouse Barnstar for your valued participation in the Teahouse pilot. Even when real life is busy, your participation has not gone unnoticed! I look forward to your continued participation at the Teahouse and thanks for all you do to make Wikipedia the invaluable resource it is! Sarah (talk) 00:24, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Sarah. I know I wasn't available, but maybe after sometime I'll be. — Bill william compton^Talk 13:41, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Afghanistan at the 2002 Asian Games

The article Afghanistan at the 2002 Asian Games you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Afghanistan at the 2002 Asian Games for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? GoP_T^C_N 18:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

• Special report: Springer's misappropriation of Wikimedia content "the tip of the iceberg"

• News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI

• WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit

• Featured content: The cake is a pi

• Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases

• Technology report: To support or not to support IPv6, and why knowing when this report was last updated might be getting easier

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 21:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

The Tea Leaf - Issue Four

Hi! Welcome to the fourth issue of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter for the Teahouse!

• Teahouse pilot wraps up after 13 weeks After being piloted on English Wikipedia starting in February, the Teahouse wrapped up its pilot period on May 27, 2012. We expect this is just the beginning for the Teahouse and hope the project will continue to grow in the months to come!

Thank you and congratulations to all of the community members who participated - and continue to participate!

• What you've all been waiting for: Teahouse Pilot Report is released! We look forward to your feedback on the methodology and outcomes of this pilot project.
• ....and if a pilot report wasn't enough, the Teahouse Pilot Metrics Report is out too! Dive into the numbers and survey results to learn about the impact the Teahouse has made on English Wikipedia.
• Teahouse shows positive impact on new editor retention and engagement

• 409 new editors participated during the entire pilot period, with about 40 new editors participating in the Teahouse per week.
• Two weeks after participating, 33% of Teahouse guests are still active on Wikipedia, as opposed to 11% of a similar control group.
• New editors who participated in the Teahouse edit 10x the number of articles, make 7x more global edits, and 2x as much of their content survives on Wikipedia compared to the control group.

• Women participate in the Teahouse 28% of Teahouse participants were women, up from 9% of editors on Wikipedia in general, good news for this project which aimed to have impact on the gender gap too - but still lots to be done here!
• New opportunities await for the Teahouse in phase two as the Teahouse team and Wikipedia community examine ways to improve, scale, and sustain the project. Opportunities for future work include:

• Automating or semi-automating systems such as invites, metrics and archiving
• Experimenting with more ways for new editors to discover the Teahouse
• Building out the social and peer-to-peer aspects further, including exploring ways to make answering questions easier, creating more ways for new editors to help each other and for all participants to acknowledge each other's efforts
• Growing volunteer capacity, continuing to transfer Teahouse administration tasks to volunteers whenever possible, and looking for new ways to make maintenance and participation easier for everyone.

• Want to know how you can lend a hand at the Teahouse? Become a host! Learn more about what makes the Teahouse different than other help spaces on Wikipedia and see how you can help new editors by visiting here.
• Say hello to the new guests at the Teahouse. Take the time to welcome and get to know the latest guests at the Teahouse. Drop off some wikilove to these editors today, as being welcomed by experienced editors is really encouraging to new Wikipedians.

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. Sarah (talk) 16:38, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

MonmouthpediA Barnstar

		Monmouthpedia Barnstar
		This is Barnstar to say thank you for all the work you've put into MonmouthpediA, I can't quite believe how successful the project has been, really very grateful, I hope you are getting a lot out of it. Many thanks Mrjohncummings (talk) 21:31, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks John. — Bill william compton^Talk 13:09, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of India at the 2011 Commonwealth Youth Games

The article India at the 2011 Commonwealth Youth Games you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:India at the 2011 Commonwealth Youth Games for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? GoP_T^C_N 11:46, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

• Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?

• News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations

• WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia

• Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"

• Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 01:56, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Annie Lanzillotto

I'm not sure how to answer on my talk page -- I hope this is correct. I received a message from you about citations. I just added more than one reliable source, or reference, I think. Can you let me know how I am doing? If I'm doing this correctly? I really want to learn how to do this correctly. Thanks so much! -Samantha Srdemuro (talk) 15:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi Samantha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Citations you have added are fine and enough to avoid any WP:PROD, but it still needs more references, like "Early Years" section is still unsourced. I have to say that article is in very good shape considering an output of newbie. For any further queries the best place is WP:Teahouse. — Bill william compton^Talk 16:19, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey Bill william compton! I've added many more references since we've last talked. Can you check and see how I'm doing with Annie Lanzillotto? Srdemuro (talk) 18:19, 28 June 2012 (UTC) Srdemuro (talk) 13:48, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Few points:

1. Don't use external links in the body of the article (read WP:EXTLINK).
2. Use properly formatted citations (read WP:CITE).
3. Try to find more reliable and independent sources like newspapers' articles, magazines, secondary and tertiary sources (read WP:RS)).
4. Don't overlink. Avoid linking common terms like writer, welfare, theatre, etc (read WP:LINK).
5. Take a look at our notability guidelines (like WP:AUTHOR, WP:NM, etc).

Feel free to contact me for any further assistance. — Bill william compton^Talk 13:57, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

• Op-ed: A call for editorial input in developing new Creative Commons licensing

• News and notes: "Mystical" Picture of the Year; run-up to Wikimania DC; RfA reform 2012

• In the news: Wales enters extradition battle; Wikipedia's political bias

• Recent research: Edit war patterns, deleters vs. the 1%, never used cleanup tags, authorship inequality, higher quality from central users, and mapping the wikimediasphere

• WikiProject report: Summer Sports Series: WikiProject Athletics

• Featured content: A good week for the Williams

• Arbitration report: Three open cases

• Technology report: Second Visual Editor prototype launches

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 05:53, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited The Secret Circle (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Miller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:29, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Mary Kom

Hi Bill, what more can be done on Mary Kom, the current COTM? Can you add some more info?? BPositive (talk) 15:30, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Indian Collaboration of the Month

	The Boxing Barnstar
	This is your for contributions on the article of Mary Kom, which was the collaboration of the month for June 2012 under WikiProject India. Thank you for your contributions and I look forward to seeing you in the July 2012 collaborations. Happy editing, happy collaborating! :-) BPositive (talk) 06:26, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 June newsletter

Apologies for the lateness of this letter; our usual bot wasn't working. We are now entering round 4, our semi-finals, and have our final 16. A score of 243 was required to reach this round; significantly more than 2011's 76 points, and only a little behind 2010's 250 points. By comparison, last year, 150 points in round 4 secured a place in the final; in 2010, 430 were needed. Commiserations to Pool A's igordebraga (submissions), who scored 242 points, missing out on a place in the round by a whisker. However, congratulations to Pool B's Grapple X (submissions), whose television articles have brought him another round victory. Pool A's Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came second overall, with an impressive list of biological did you knows, good articles and featured articles. Third overall was Pool D's Muboshgu (submissions), with a long list of contibutions, mostly relating to baseball. Of course, with the points resetting every round, the playing field has been levelled. The most successful Pool was Pool D, which saw seven into the final round. Pool B saw four, C saw three and Pool A saw only the two round leaders.

A quick note about other competitions taking place on Wikipedia which may be of interest. There are 13 days remaining in the June-July GAN backlog elimination drive, but it is not too late to take part. August will also see the return of The Core Contest- a one month long competition first run in 2007. While the WikiCup awards points for audited content on any subject, The Core Contest about is raw article improvement, focussing heavily on the most important articles on Wikipedia. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:45, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

• Analysis: Uncovering scientific plagiarism

• Op-ed: Representing knowledge – metadata, data and linked data

• News and notes: RfC on joining lobby group; JSTOR accounts for Wikipedians and the article feedback tool

• In the news: Public relations on Wikipedia: friend or foe?

• Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations

• WikiProject report: Summer sports series: Burning rubber with WikiProject Motorsport

• Featured content: Heads up

• Arbitration report: Three open cases, motion for the removal of Carnildo's administrative tools

• Technology report: Initialisms abound: QA and HTML5

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 10:50, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Help

Hi...I found your comments on the talk page User talk:122.108.141.223. This particular user has vandalized a lot of pages related to 2010 Commonwealth Games including Boxing at the 2010 Commonwealth Games, Boxing at the 2010 Commonwealth Games – Light welterweight and India at the 2010 Commonwealth Games. Even the picture in Boxing at the 2010 Commonwealth Games, Manoj Kumar (boxer) and Bradley Saunders was vandalized. The user exchanged the gold and silver medals in the picture. The original picture is this File:Boxing winners at the 2010 Commonwealth Games.png

I am relatively new at Wikipedia and am really amazed at how much information this user has distorted. I put up a warning on his talk page but dont know what else to do...especially about the edited images. Please help. Thank you! Sayan rc (talk) 00:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Can you be a little more specific about the problem? Is s/he adding factually incorrect information to the pages? And, what's the discrepancy in the picture? — Bill william compton^Talk 04:24, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes...the gold medal in Manoj Kumar (boxer)'s hand (the person second from left) has been photoshopped to a silver medal and the silver medal of Bradley Saunders (the leftmost person)is replaced by a gold medal in the pages Boxing at the 2010 Commonwealth Games, Manoj Kumar (boxer) and Bradley Saunders. And on the basis of this picture s/he has added factually incorrect information to atleast half a dozen pages...announcing it was Bradley Saunders who won gold in the event instead of Manoj Kumar (boxer) who originally won. I reverted the page edits with appropriate references but dont know what to do with the pics. Sayan rc (talk) 16:06, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. I've nominated all the uploads by this problematic user for deletion. — Bill william compton^Talk 16:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Annah Mac

You have been invited to join the Annah Mac WikiProject, a WikiProject on the English Wikipedia dedicated to improving articles and lists related to Annah Mac. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page and add the yourself to the participants category. Thank You. Cmbcmb999 (talk) 20:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

• Special report: Reforming the education programs: lessons from Cairo

• News and notes: Russian Wikipedia blackout; WMF tools; Wikitravel proposal revisited

• WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Football

• Featured content: Keeps on chuggin'

• Arbitration report: Three requests for arbitration

• Technology report: Optimism over LastModified and MoodBar, but change in clock time causes downtime

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 10:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

CSD on Danny Stimpson

Hi, I wanted to let you know that I have challenged your WP:CSD A7 on Danny Stimpson. The article claims he is a professional footballer, which is a claim of importance sufficient to satisfy the low threshold of criteria A7. He likely would not pass the stricter notability criteria, but that is a matter for either a prod or AfD nomination. I have also BLPPRODed the article. Monty₈₄₅ 16:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for 2012 Sevens Grand Prix Series

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force

—Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 16:43, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Merci Vensatry. — Bill william compton^Talk 11:48, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Jawaharlal Nehru University official logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Jawaharlal Nehru University official logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

• Special report: Chapters Association mired in controversy over new chair

• News and notes: WMF enacts reforms at Wikimania; main page redesign; 4 millionth article milestone

• WikiProject report: Summer sports series: French WikiProject Cycling

• Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations

• Wikimania: Young chapter shows experience beyond its years

• Featured content: Taking flight

• Technology report: Tech talks at Wikimania amid news of a mixed June

• Arbitration report: Fæ faces site-ban, proposed decisions posted

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 10:48, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Uttar Pradesh

I've listed this page for peer review.Please do give your valuable and important suggestion. Thank You -25 CENTS VICTORIOUS^☣ 16:49, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Geoffrey of Monmouth Challenge Gold Contributor

	Geoffrey of Monmouth Challenge, Gold Contributor
	For your efforts in contributing articles to the MonmouthpediA project, you were one of the top 5 contributors in the Geoffrey of Monmouth Challenge, Thank you! We've started a new project, GibraltarpediA, please have a look. Mrjohncummings (talk) 21:58, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Also please message your address to john.cummings@monmouthpedia.org and your prizes will be sent out as soon as the tshirts have been printed

Thanks John. — Bill william compton^Talk 13:22, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse!

Hi Bill. I hope you are doing well. I noticed you haven't been that active in the Teahouse for quite sometime. No problem, of course. I do hope things are going well for you in other areas of Wikipedia, and offline as well! I have taken the liberty of moving your profile to the host breakroom for the time being. Feel free to move it back to the main host page whenever you are ready to jump back in. See ya =) Sarah (talk) 17:24, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

• Paid editing: Does Wikipedia pay? The skeptic: Orange Mike

• From the editor: Signpost developments

• News and notes: Chapter head speaks about the aftermath of Russian Wikipedia shutdown

• WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Olympics

• Arbitration report: Fæ and Michaeldsuarez banned; Kwamikagami desysopped; Falun Gong closes with mandated external reviews and topic bans

• Op-ed: The future of PR on Wikipedia

• Featured content: When is an island not an island?

• Technology report: Translating SVGs and making history bugs history

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 10:58, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify: July Newsletter and August Drive

EdwardsBot (talk) 21:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai logo.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

India at 2012 Summer Olympics

Thanks for deleting the Knocked Out table. I also suggested removing this table as it is very difficult to maintain and is very ambiguous. Prateek (talk) 12:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

I couldn't agree more. — Bill william compton^Talk 17:51, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Daniel Hughes (musician) "Speedy Deletion"

Dear Sir,

I am writing because I received the following email:

"Dear MaestroHughes,

"The Wikipedia page "User talk:MaestroHughes" has been created on 30 July 2012 by Bill william compton, with the edit summary: Notification: speedy deletion nomination of [[Daniel Hughes (musician)]]. (TW)

"This is a new page. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MaestroHughes for the current revision.

"To contact the editor, visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bill_william_compton

"Note that additional changes to the page "User talk:MaestroHughes" will not result in any further notifications, until you have logged in and visited the page.

           "Your friendly Wikipedia notification system"

I am more than upset, for there is NO copyright infringement, since the page I was creating was about ME! I AM DANIEL HUGHES! I log in name is MaestroHughes. I created this page under that log in a while back, but it never showed up in any searches on Wikipedia. I did some homework, and found the best way to create a page (since I guessed I had done it incorrectly) was to do a search for an item or name, and then click on the red sentence that says one can create a page. I did a search for "Daniel Hughes (musician" with the hope of creating that page, and finally being found in a Wikipedia search. Instead, I get an alert saying it will be deleted. Please advise what I should do! (On a side note, the original page I created that never showed up [which had a title of "User:MaestroHughes" has been stripped clean to zero content. I couldn't figure out how to actually delete the whole thing.)

Your help would be greatly appreciated. And please do not delete the page!

~Daniel Hughes tactus60@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaestroHughes (talk • contribs) 05:34, 30 July 2012 (UTC)