Ajalberts
|
July 2014 edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Huffy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Huffy was changed by Ajalberts (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920515 on 2014-07-11T22:14:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:14, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Huffy, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 00:51, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Huffy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Acroterion (talk) 00:51, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Re: I was deleted but I should not have been edit
Re your message: Your edits to Huffy and Digital Domain were removed because they violated several Wikipedia editing policies. Specifically, the policy on the biographies of living people with your attacks against John Textor, the neutral point of view policy with your obvious polemical statements regarding the bankruptcy proceedings of both companies, your unsourced statements]], and finally the original research policy. Additionally, I'm pretty sure that the "F.C.C.", as you stated, has little interest is the business of building bicycles. Wikipedia is not here to right great wrongs. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:53, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Huffy. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:33, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014 edit
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Huffy and Digital Domain. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 01:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014 edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Digital Domain. Acroterion (talk) 02:18, 15 July 2014 (UTC)