This user is a member of the

Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD
AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.

Majority ≠ right This user recognizes that even if 300,000,000 people make the same mistake, it's still a mistake.
wyf-
man
This user understands grammatical gender historically preceded and is independent of natural gender.
This user trusts Wikipedia as a reliable source.
con This user is interested in conservative issues.
This user is interested in politics.
This user is interested in the history of the Cold War.
This user is a deficit hawk.
randThis user opposes Ayn Rand's objectivist philosophy.
This user opposes corporate welfare and bailouts.
This user is against involuntary military service.
ABNRThis user has No Reservations.
P&TThis user is a fan of Penn & Teller: Bullshit!.BS!
SO WHAT This user agrees with the belief that FOX News is not Fair or Balanced, but prefers it anyway.
This user regrets that every local idiot can post a comment on the Internet.