GA Review edit
I believe it is every editor's responsibility to give back to the community in the form of quality assessment. There is a dearth of editors willing to review other people's works and judge its quality. It is my opinion that of the three major article assessment projects (FAC, Peer Review, and GAC) that the GA review process is the most beneficial. It provides critical feedback to editors and allows so many more editors the chance to receive recognition for their work. It is a great way to ensure article quality without forcing the editors through the rigors of the FA process. Below is a list of my GA reviews.
There was a GA Sweeps project that evaluated articles that have passed GA some time ago. Here is a total of my sweeps.