Talk:Zelder paradox

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zelder paradox article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 3 March 2011 by reviewer Alpha Quadrant (talk · contribs).

Sociology Start‑class Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This isn't a thing.

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There are literally no peer-reviewed papers which refer to this observation as "the Zelder paradox." (2601:146:C002:B080:8403:D511:A27D:50EE (talk) 23:30, 22 June 2016 (UTC))Reply