Talk:Who Killed...... The Zutons?

Latest comment: 3 days ago by Gonnym in topic Requested move 8 May 2024

Fair use rationale for Image:Who Killed The Zutons.jpg edit

 

Image:Who Killed The Zutons.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Questionable question mark edit

Whilst the title of this article has been given a very specific number of dots (6), which is correct, it has a question mark at the end that surely shouldn't be there. Yes, I know that who.. is in the form of a question, but the question mark simply isn't in the title of the album, so the article shouldn't have one either should it? nagualdesign (talk) 05:57, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Who Killed...... The Zutons?. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 8 May 2024 edit

Who Killed...... The Zutons?Who Killed the Zutons? – or Who Killed the Zutons (without the question mark) – or Who Killed ... the Zutons? – or Who Killed ... the Zutons (without the question mark). This is the only article title I can find on Wikipedia that includes more than five consecutive dots in its title (and I found only four that have five consecutive dots). That's a rather strange form, and it is not supported consistently in the cited sources. Although the album cover does include six dots, most of the cited sources appear to just use "Who Killed the Zutons?" (or "Who Killed The Zutons?", which Wikipedia would not do), with or without the question mark at the end. Some use an ordinary three-dot ellipsis (with or without spaces around the ellipsis). Also, as pointed out in 2012 by nagualdesign, the album cover and many sources omit the question mark. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 18:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  ASUKITE 20:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Who Killed the Zutons?
Points of information:
  • The version on The Zutons' official website has the 6 dots and a question mark. WP:ABOUTSELF?
  • Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles of works#Typographic effects says: "Do not attempt (with HTML, Unicode, wikimarkup, inline images, or any other method) to emulate any purely typographic effects used in titles when giving the title in Wikipedia, though an article on a work may also include a note about how it is often styled, e.g. in marketing materials."
  • MOS:ELLIPSIS: "Wikipedia's style for an ellipsis is three unspaced dots; do not use the precomposed ellipsis character or three dots separated by spaces."
  • Spotify and Amazon digital music have "Who Killed The Zutons?" I was thinking these might be a version of "the work as a reliable source on itself", like liner notes, in a digital age, but...
  • ...Apple Music has "Who Killed the Zutons?", which is more in keeping with Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Album article style advice#"The"
Rationale:
Jonathan Deamer (talk) 18:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'll support Who Killed the Zutons?, based on the MOS & WP:CRITERIA, and will also support Who Killed ... the Zutons? if that gains traction (anytime we see conflicting standards it can be tricky to pick which one, so I don't want to exclude the more consistent punctuation if anybody feels the stylization is necessary, however I generally lean away from stylizing our titles when possible) ASUKITE 20:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Alternative music and WikiProject Albums have been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 20:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose based on the arguments presented. Specicially, points 2 and 3 are not even relevant. Gonnym (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply