Talk:Veðrfölnir and eagle/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 03:10, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   One grammatical error noted below.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Short article but I've reviewed the background and I think it covers everything adequately.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

5. It is stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   2 images, both WPCommons-hosted public domain images.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Notes

• "may have been influenced by these Asiatic cosmologies from a northern." - there is a missing word here: from a northern what?
• "...asks High what other notable facts..." - can an adjective be provided indicating who High is? Like "asks the deity High..." or "asks High, a wise deity,...".

Both issues fixed. Thanks for reviewing the article! :bloodofox: (talk) 03:06, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

OK. Thanks. maclean (talk) 00:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)