Talk:Timeline of snowflake research

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 192.77.12.11 in topic Intrigued people throughout history

Intrigued people throughout history

edit

Surely you need a microscope to see the six sides of a snowflake ?

Hence surely replace "throughout history" with "since invention of microscope in about 1590AD! Tabletop (talk) 03:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

While I know you posted this concern more than a decade ago, it might as well be addressed.
It is possible for some snowflakes to be large enough to be seen with the naked eye, given the right conditions for forming.
Additionally, While the microscope may have been invented in the 16th century, lenses and magnifying glasses have existed much longer.
192.77.12.11 (talk) 05:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Timeline of snowflake research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply