Talk:Thomas Brunner/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rosiestep (talk · contribs) 02:34, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

I'll review this one within the week. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:34, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Service with the New Zealand Company

• "In 1844" - add a comma  Done

Later life

• "... but with the proviso that he would able to take on private work which did not interfere with his duties." This seems to be missing a word.  Done

Retirement and death

• "By mid-April 1874" - add a comma  Done

@Zawed: This is a very well-written article which really draws in the reader. I found only nitpicky items to mention. Let me know when you want me to return to the review so that I can pass it. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:15, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

@Rosiestep: Firstly, thank you for taking the time to review this article, it is greatly appreciated. I have fixed the three issues that you have identified above so hopefully it is now satisfactory. Thanks again. Zawed (talk) 07:50, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Good job. Looks adequate for GA. --Rosiestep (talk) 13:07, 3 May 2014 (UTC)